Efficacy of Directional Preference Management for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

Author:

Surkitt Luke D.1,Ford Jon J.2,Hahne Andrew J.3,Pizzari Tania4,McMeeken Joan M.5

Affiliation:

1. L.D. Surkitt, BPhysio, CredMDT, Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Level 2, HS3, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia.

2. J.J. Ford, PhD, MPhysio, BAppSc(Physio), CredMDT, Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University.

3. A.J. Hahne, PhD, BPhysio(Hons), Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University.

4. T. Pizzari, PhD, BPhysio(Hons), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University.

5. J.M. McMeeken, DipPhysio, BSc(Hons), MSc, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

BackgroundProviding specific treatment based on symptom response for people with low back pain (LBP) and a directional preference (DP) is a widely used treatment approach. The efficacy of treatment using the principles of directional preference management (DPM) for LBP is unclear.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of treatment using the principles of DPM for people with LBP and a DP.MethodsComputer databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English up to January 2010. Only RCTs investigating DPM for people with LBP and a DP were included. Outcomes for pain, back specific function, and work participation were extracted.ResultsSix RCTs were included in this review. Five were considered high quality. Clinical heterogeneity of the included trials prevented meta-analysis. GRADE quality assessment revealed mixed results; however, moderate evidence was identified that DPM was significantly more effective than a number of comparison treatments for pain, function, and work participation at short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term follow-ups. No trials found that DPM was significantly less effective than comparison treatments.ConclusionsAlthough this systematic review showed mixed results, some evidence was found supporting the effectiveness of DPM when applied to participants with a DP, particularly at short-term and intermediate-term follow-ups. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to evaluate the effect of DPM applied to people with LBP and a DP.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3