Hop Testing Provides a Reliable and Valid Outcome Measure During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Author:

Reid Andrea1,Birmingham Trevor B2,Stratford Paul W3,Alcock Greg K4,Giffin J Robert5

Affiliation:

1. A Reid, PT, MSc, was a physiotherapist at the Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, 3M Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, during the completion of this project. She is currently a physiotherapist at the Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Centre, John Owen Pavilion, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

2. TB Birmingham, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor and Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, School of Physical Therapy, Elborn College, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1, and Co-Director, Wolf Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic

3. PW Stratford, PT, MSc, is Professor, School of Rehabilitation Science, and Associate Member, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and a Scientific Affiliate in the Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. GK Alcock, PT, MSc, is Physiotherapist, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic

5. JR Giffin, MD, FRCS(C), is Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, and Co-Director, Wolf Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic

Abstract

Background and Purpose Although various hop tests have been proposed as performance-based outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, limited reports of their measurement properties exist. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and longitudinal validity of data obtained from hop tests during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Subjects Forty-two patients, 15 to 45 years of age, who had undergone ACL reconstruction participated in the study. Methods and Measures The study design was prospective and observational with repeated measures. The subjects performed a series of 4 hop tests on 3 separate occasions within the 16th week following surgery and on a fourth occasion 6 weeks later. The tests were a single hop for distance, a 6-m timed hop, a triple hop for distance, and crossover hops for distance. Performance on the ACL-reconstructed limb was expressed as a percentage of the performance on the nonoperative limb, termed the “limb symmetry index.” Subjects also completed the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and a global rating of change questionnaire. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients for limb symmetry index values ranged from .82 to .93. Standard errors of measurement were 3.04% to 5.59%. Minimal detectable changes, at the 90% confidence level, were 7.05% to 12.96%. Changes in hop test scores on the operative limb were statistically greater than changes on the nonoperative limb. Pearson correlations (r) between change in hop performances and self-reported measures ranged from .26 to .58. Discussion and Conclusion The results show that the described series of hop tests provide a reliable and valid performance-based outcome measure for patients undergoing rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction. These findings support the use and facilitate the interpretation of hop tests for research and clinical practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference43 articles.

1. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis: consensus development at OMERACT III;Bellamy;J Rheumatol,1997

2. A guide to health measurement;Jackowski;Clin Orthop Rel Res,2003

3. Validation of the lower extremity functional scale on athletic subjects with ankle sprains;Alcock;Physiother Can,2002

4. Applying evidence on outcome measures to hand therapy practice;MacDermid;Journal of Hand Therapy,2004

5. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data;Stratford;Phys Ther,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3