An Investigation of Cervical Spinal Posture in Cervicogenic Headache

Author:

Farmer Peter K.1,Snodgrass Suzanne J.2,Buxton Anthony J.3,Rivett Darren A.4

Affiliation:

1. P.K. Farmer, BAppSc(Physio), MPhil(Physio), Thrive Physio Health Clinic, Erina, New South Wales, Australia.

2. S.J. Snodgrass, PT, PhD, MMedSc(Physio), Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Hunter Building, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia 2308.

3. A.J. Buxton, DipAppSc(Med Rad), MHEd, Discipline of Medical Radiation Science (Diagnostic Radiography), School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle.

4. D.A. Rivett, PhD, MAppSc(ManipPhty), BAppSc(Phty), Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle.

Abstract

Background Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is defined as headache symptoms originating from the cervical spine. Cervical dysfunction from abnormal posture has been proposed to aggravate or cause CGH, but there are conflicting reports as to whether there is an association between posture and CGH. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in cervical spinal posture, measured on radiographs, between patients with probable CGH and asymptomatic control participants. Design A single-blinded comparative measurement design was used. Methods Differences in postural variables from radiographs between participants with CGH (n=30) and age- and sex-matched asymptomatic control participants (n=30) were determined using paired t tests or the nonparametric equivalent. Postural variables were general cervical lordosis (GCL, Cobb angle C2–C7), upper cervical lordosis (UCL, sagittal alignment C2 compared with C3–C4), and C2 spinous process horizontal deviation. Logistic regression determined postural variables, increasing the likelihood of CGH. Results There were no significant differences in posture between the CGH and control groups. The mean GCL was 10.97 degrees (SD=7.50) for the CGH group and 7.17 degrees (SD=5.69) for the control group. The mean UCL was 11.86 degrees (SD=6.46) for the CGH group and 9.44 degrees (SD=4.28) for the control group. The mean C2 spinous process horizontal deviation was 3.00 mm (SD=1.66) for the CGH group and 2.86 mm (SD=2.04) for the control group. However, there was a significant association between greater GCL and an increased likelihood of having CGH (odds ratio=1.08; 95% confidence interval=1.001, 1.191). Limitations The findings are limited to an association between GCL and posture, as cause and effect cannot be determined. Conclusions The association between greater GCL and increased likelihood of having CGH suggests that GCL might be considered in the treatment of patients with CGH. However, as the data do not support posture as a cause of CGH, it is unknown whether addressing posture would reduce CGH.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference58 articles.

1. Spinal curves and health: a systematic critical review of the epidemiological literature dealing with associations between sagittal spinal curves and health;Christensen;J Manipulative Physiol Ther,2008

2. Structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: rationale for treatment beyond the resolution of symptoms;Troyanovich;J Manipulative Physiol Ther,1998

3. Cervicogenic headache: a real headache;Antonaci;Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2011

4. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment;Bogduk;Lancet Neurol,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3