Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life, Work Status, and Health Care Utilization and Costs According to Hip and Knee Joint Disease Severity: A National Australian Study

Author:

Ackerman Ilana N.1,Ademi Zanfina2,Osborne Richard H.3,Liew Danny4

Affiliation:

1. I.N. Ackerman, BPhysio(Hons), PhD, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Mailing address: Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3050 Australia.

2. Z. Ademi, MPharm, MPH, PhD, The University of Melbourne.

3. R.H. Osborne, BSc, PhD, Public Health Innovation, Population Health Strategic Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

4. D. Liew, MBBS(Hons), FRACP, PhD, The University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Abstract

Background No population-based studies have investigated how the impact of hip and knee joint disease may vary with increasing severity. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work status, and health service utilization and costs according to severity of hip and knee joint disease. Design A national cross-sectional survey was conducted. Methods Five thousand individuals were randomly selected from the Australian electoral roll and invited to complete a questionnaire to screen for doctor-diagnosed hip arthritis, hip osteoarthritis (OA), knee arthritis, and knee OA. Severity was classified by means of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (range=0–100): <7=asymptomatic, 7–38=mild-moderate, and ≥39=severe. Health-related quality of life was evaluated by means of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument (range=−0.04 to 1.00; scored worst-best). Self-reported data on work status and health service utilization were collected, with health care costs estimated with the use of government data. Results Data were available for 1,157 participants, with 237 (20%) reporting hip or knee joint disease. Of these, 16% (n=37) were classified as asymptomatic, 51% (n=120) as mild-moderate, and 27% (n=64) as severe. The severe group reported very low HRQoL (adjusted mean AQoL=0.43, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=0.38–0.47) compared with the mild-moderate group (adjusted mean AQoL=0.72, 95% CI=0.69–0.75) and the asymptomatic group (adjusted mean AQoL=0.80, 95% CI=0.74–0.86). Compared with the asymptomatic group, the severe group was >3 times less likely to undertake paid work (adjusted odds ratio=0.28, 95% CI=0.09–0.88) and >4 times less likely to undertake unpaid work (adjusted odds ratio=0.24, 95% CI=0.10–0.62). Although physical therapy services were used infrequently, primary and specialist care utilization and costs were highest for the severe group. Limitations Other costs (including physical therapy consultations) were unavailable. Conclusions A clear pattern of worsening HRQoL, reduced work participation, and higher medical care utilization was seen with increasing severity of joint disease.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference41 articles.

1. Pain, physical functioning and quality of life of individuals awaiting total joint replacement: a longitudinal study;McHugh;J Eval Clin Pract,2008

2. Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery;Ackerman;Arthritis Care Res,2005

3. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002;Kurtz;J Bone Joint Surg Am,2005

4. Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006;Culliford;J Bone Joint Surg Br,2010

5. Forecasting the burden of advanced knee osteoarthritis over a 10-year period in a cohort of 60–64 year-old US adults;Holt;Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2011

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3