Longitudinal Construct Validity of the GMFM-88 Total Score and Goal Total Score and the GMFM-66 Score in a 5-Year Follow-up Study

Author:

Lundkvist Josenby Annika1,Jarnlo Gun-Britt2,Gummesson Christina3,Nordmark Eva4

Affiliation:

1. A Lundkvist Josenby, PT, MSc, is a PhD student, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, and Pediatric Physiotherapist, Children's Hospital, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.

2. GB Jarnlo, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University.

3. C Gummesson, PT, PhD, is Senior Lecturer, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University.

4. E Nordmark, PT, PhD, is Senior Lecturer, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University.

Abstract

Background The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is the instrument most commonly used to measure gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Different scoring options have been developed, and their measurement properties have been assessed. Limited information is available regarding longitudinal construct validity. Objective The objective of this research was to study the longitudinal construct validity of 3 scoring options: the 88-item GMFM (GMFM-88) total, the GMFM-88 goal total, and the 66-item GMFM (GMFM-66). Design A clinical measurement design was used in this study. Methods Forty-one children with CP diplegia who were undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) were monitored with the GMFM for 5 years. The mean age at SDR was 4.4 years (range=2.5–6.6). Two subgroups for gross motor function before surgery were created according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS): GMFCS levels I to III and GMFCS levels IV and V. This study included results obtained before SDR and at 6, 12, and 18 months and 3 and 5 years after SDR. The effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated. Results At 6 months postoperatively, ES and SRM values were small (≤0.5) for all GMFM scoring options. The GMFM-88 total and goal total scores showed large changes in ES values (range=0.8–0.9) and SRM values (range=0.9–1.3) at 12 months postoperatively, whereas the GMFM-66 scores showed lower ES values (range=0.3–0.4) and SRM values (range=0.7–0.8) for both subgroups. Later postoperatively, larger values for longitudinal construct validity were found. The ES and SRM values generally were lower for the GMFM-66 scores than for the GMFM-88 total and goal total scores. Limitations All children underwent an extensive intervention, and changes in gross motor function were expected. Conclusion All 3 scoring options showed large longitudinal construct validity in the long-term follow-up. The GMFM-88 total and goal total scores revealed large changes in gross motor function earlier postoperatively than the GMFM-66 scores.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3