Medial turn and aesthetics of excess

Author:

Stojanović-Prelević Ivana

Abstract

The evolution of media system had an impact on human forms of communication and the relationship between human beings and reality (Schmidt,2013). In addition, the relationship between the media and human beings has undergone changes. Human beings have become an instrument of the media, rather than its goal, which is opposite to deontological ethics based on the respect of human dignity. After transition from communicativeness to mediality, one can talk about the mediatization of mind, which consists of the development of new tools: computers (Hudzik, 2018) and technocentrism (Krämer, 1989). The medial turn means that the form is more important than the content, which is reflected in the media aesthetics, also called (after the media turn occurred) the aesthetics of excess. (Lipovecki, Seroa 2013). The author explains the medial turn phenomenon and explores the nature of the corresponding media aesthetics. A descriptive method is used. Given that visual culture is widespread, due to the development of technologies and possibilities of manipulating and using different effects, the focus of media contents is more on the image, which goes in favor of the hypothesis that contemporary society is the society of images, not of the text (Mirzoef, 1983). This is also the main hypothesis in the paper, which is confirmed in the conclusion.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference30 articles.

1. Anakijev, S. (2012). Instrumentalizacija senzacionalizma -tabloidi. Stetoskop. Posećeno:3. 9. 2021. URL:https://www.stetoskop. info/psihologija-danas/instrumentalizacija-senzacionalizma--tabloidi;

2. Bruhn, J. (2016). What is Mediality and How does it matter? Theoretical Terms and Methodology, doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-57841-9_2;

3. Burdije, P. (2020). Narcisovo ogledalo, Beograd: Clio;

4. Catwright, L. Sturken, M. (2001). Practice of Looking, An Introduction to Visual Culture, New York: Oxford University Press;

5. Colapietro, V. (2006). Democracy as Moral Ideal, The Kettering Review, 24:3, 21-31;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3