On "Westsplaining," realism, and technologies of the Self: A Foucauldian reading of the realist commentary on Ukraine

Author:

Kazharski AliakseiORCID

Abstract

The article offers a Foucauldian reading of the Western realist commentary on the Russo-Ukrainian war which often faces the charges of "Westsplaining. " It situates this commentary in the broader context of knowledge production and the power-knowledge nexūs it reproduces and conceptualizes realism as a discourse in the Foucauldian sense. As the article argues, this conceptualization allows one to capture its specific technologies of power which, in this case, can be understood as a form of technology of the Self, or, in other words, the disciplining of the collective subjects of world politics (nation-states) through the specifically realist constructs of rationality and prudence that all states are expected to adhere to in the making of their foreign policy. Additionally, the article suggests that this conceptualization of realism as a discourse can be analytically helpful in making sense of the way in which very different genres such as academic research and the op-ed policy commentary, frequently provided by realist IR scholars, are connected through the political economy of knowledge production, thus forming a relationship of discursive symbiosis and mutual legitimation.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference56 articles.

1. Agnew, John. 2003. Geopolitics. Re-visioning world politics. Second edition. New York: Routledge;

2. Ashley, Richard K. 1986. "The Poverty of Neorealism. " In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Robert O. Keohane, 255-300. New York: Columbia University Press;

3. Axyonova, Vera, and Katsiaryna Lozka. 2023. "'We are at war': Reflections on positionality and research as negotiation in post-2022 Ukraine. " Journal of International Relations and Development 26: 711-721. https://doi.org/10.1057/ s41268-023-00297-z;

4. Bahenský, Vojtěch. 2022. "Can 'Realists' and 'Hawks' Agree? Half-measures and Compromises on the Road to Invasion of Ukraine. " Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 16 (3): 56-74;

5. Betts, Richard K. 2015. "Realism Is an Attitude, Not a Doctrine. " The National Interest, August 24. Accessed December 7, 2023. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/realismattitude-not-doctrine-13659;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3