An approach to evaluation of quality of complex systems/equipment

Author:

Pendić ZoranORCID,Polak Lara,Jakovljević Bojana,Polak Marko,Milijić Ana,Marković Željko,Jovanović DraganaORCID,Strižak Marina,Jovanović Ljiljana

Abstract

Fast technology development (Industry 4.0/5.0) and the increasing complexity of systems/equipment, combined with limited resources, increasing inflation rates and reduced capital investment opportunities, require the implementation of systems that include high reliability and availability, with minimal life cycle costs. This imposes new requirements regarding the technological processes of production, operation and maintenance. In addition, modern complex systems/equipment are mostly based on computers due to rapid technological advances in microelectronics, microprocessors and computing. Investment in the process of modernization and further development of systems/equipment and/or maintaining the level of their availability is often carried out on a large scale. Complex systems/equipment include: various military and commercial C3 systems, nomenclature systems, production systems, production control systems, eco-product development process, complex medical equipment... Such systems also include water supply systems for drinking water supply, which are managed by water supply organizations. Before starting any modernization of a complex system/equipment, it is necessary to assess its quality and only then, based on the quality analysis, approach its modernization. For the purposes of evaluating the quality of a complex system/equipment, it is necessary to divide it into a series of basic objects: documentation, personnel potential, personnel education, hardware, software... Quality assessments of individual basic objects, taken with a certain weight, give the possibility to evaluate the quality of the observed complex system/equipment. The quality assessment of each object of a complex system/equipment is performed according to a hierarchical model with three levels. Quality factors (correctness, reliability, efficiency...) are at the highest level. At the intermediate level the quality criteria representing the properties of the facilities are necessary in order to satisfy the required quality factors (consistency, traceability, operability, standardization, possibility of training...). At the lowest level is the quality metric (requirements, questions, quantitative relations, etc.), which provides a quantitative assessment of the considered object. The paper will specifically consider the basic facility of the water supply system: the technical system for water delivery (raw water pipelines, main drinking water pipelines, water network of pipes to consumers, water pipe installations in commercial/residential buildings...).

Publisher

Union of Engineers of Belgrade

Reference61 articles.

1. Boehm BW, Brown JR, Kaspar H. Characteristics of Software Quality. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978;

2. Waiters GF, McCall JA. The Development of Metrics for Software R &M. In Proc. IEEE Ann. R &M Symp., pp. 79-85, 1978;

3. Venkataraman BK, Ward WA, Jr. An Introduction to Software Quality, US Army Corps of Engineers, TR ITL -99 -4, 43 p., June 1999;

4. ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Systems and software engineering -Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) -System and software quality models (This standard was last reviewed and confirmed in 2017. Therefore this version remains current.), ISO, Geneva, Switzerland 2011;

5. Pendic ZR, Kovacevic Lj, Stupar J. An approach to evaluation of quality of integrated information systems, Annual Review in Automatic Programming, Vol. 14, no. Part 2, pp. 63-68, 1988;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3