Abstract
The paper shows how enactivism can be used as a theoretical framework in psychiatry. An enactive approach can help solve the problem of integration in psychiatry and how to meaningfully connect the different perspectives with which we explain the causes and nature of psychiatric disorders. Enactivism allows us to comprehensively connect the phenomenological, neurophysiological, sociocultural, and existential aspects of psychiatric disorders and holistically approach their understanding and treatment. I will explain what the tenets of enactivism are, what the problem of integration in psychiatry is, and how, according to Saneke de Haan, we can provide a solution to this problem through the enactivist approach. Finally, I will suggest how enactivism can be enriched by adding an ecological perspective.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference61 articles.
1. Bruineberg, J. and Rietveld, E. Selforganization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014; 8, 1-14;
2. Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., and Rietveld, E. The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese. 2018; 195(6), 2417-2444;
3. Chalmers, D. The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Philosophy of mind series. Oxford University Press, New York; 1996;
4. Chemero, A. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. MIT Press; 2009;
5. Clark, A. & D. Chalmers. The extended mind. Analysis. 1998; 58(1): 7-19;
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献