Possibility of using optical coherence tomography in daily clinical practice (review)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Possibility of using optical coherence tomography in daily clinical practice (review)

Published:2024-07-09 Issue:2 Volume:39 Page:58-68
ISSN:2713-265X
Container-title:Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
language:
Short-container-title:SJCEM

Author:

Suslov I. V.¹^ORCID,Pekarsky S. E.¹^ORCID,Baev A. E.¹^ORCID,Tarasov M. G.¹^ORCID,Gergert E. S.¹,Gromovoy R. M.¹^ORCID,Bogdanov Y. I.¹^ORCID,Sultanov S. M.¹^ORCID,Gorokhovsky A. A.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the primary cause of death among the adult population of Russian Federation. An effective pathogenetic method for treating this pathology is revascularization of coronary arteries, performed endovascularly or surgically. The combination of surgical radicalism and low traumatism has made stenting of the coronary arteries the leading method of CHD treating: today in Russia the number of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) operations is approximately 6 times higher than the number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations. However, PCI showed comparatively lower long-term effectiveness than CABG and thus needs to be improved. Considering the number of PCIs performed, any significant increase in the effectiveness of this method can provide a significant reduction in mortality from coronary artery disease and, accordingly, mortality in general. One of the most promising ways to increase the effectiveness of PCI today is the use of modern intravascular imaging technologies.

Publisher

Cardiology Research Institute

Reference60 articles.

1. Alekyan B.G., Grigor’yan A.M., Staferov A.V., Karapetyan N.G. Endovascular diagnostics and treatment in the Russian Federation (2021). Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2022;9(Special Issue):S5– S254. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24183/2409-4080-2022-9S-S5-S254.

2. Witzenbichler B., Maehara A., Weisz G., Neumann F.-J., Rinaldi M.J., Metzger D.C. et al. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents (ADAPT-DES) Study. Circulation. 2014;129(4):463–470. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942.

3. Hong S.-J., Kim B.-K., Shin D.-H., Nam C.-M., Kim J.-S., Ko Y.-G. et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2155–2163. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.15454.

4. Elgendy I.Y., Mahmoud A.N., Elgendy A.Y., Bavry A.A. Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2016;9(4):e003700. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003700.

5. Buccheri S., Franchina G., Romano S., Puglisi S., Venuti G., D’Arrigo P. et al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017;10(24):2488–2498. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051.