Abstract
Relations between the Holocaust, memory, and law are constantly reconceptualized. In the second decade of the 21st century there is no clear consensus on the way the Holocaust, memory, and law are or should be interconnected, especially in Central and Eastern Europe. A striking example of the new dynamics of those tensions is an amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance, which in January 2018 inserted Articles 55a and 55b. The paper states that these controversial provisions (later withdrawn) should be understood as specific memory laws in response to the transnational memory of the Holocaust and the non-consensual dialogue on the Jedwabne pogrom in Polish society. The paper shows the law as a result of a certain dialogue, a voice in the dialogue, and an attempt to limit this dialogue – as well as the effects of such limitation. The paper adopts Leszek Koczanowicz’s conception of dialogue, Natan Sznaider’s description of the transnational Holocaust memory, as well as the idea of the future-oriented ethics of never again, and Eviatar Zerubavel’s concept of a conspiracy of silence in order to frame the context and meaning of the emergence, short life, disappearance, and traces of the law. Although these articles “refract” criminalization of the Holocaust and genocide negationism, understood in the context of Polish historical politics, they are themselves close to a specific form of denial, i.e. denial of the Jedwabne massacre. A recollection of the Polish memory law casts a shadow on the future, as a threat exists that the law might appear again.
Publisher
Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR
Reference23 articles.
1. Ambrosewicz-Jacobs, J. (2019). The uses and the abuses of education about the Holocaust in Poland after 1989. Holocaust Studies 25/3, 329–350.
2. Assman, A. (2013). Europe’s Divided Memory. In U. Blacker, A. Etkind, J. Fedor (Eds.), Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Babińska, M., Bilewicz, M., Bulska, D., Haska, A., Winiewski, M. (2018). Stosunek do Żydów i ich historii po wprowadzeniu ustawy o IPN. Analiza przygotowana na zlecenie Biura Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich. Warszawa: Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich.
4. Baer, A., Sznaider, N. (2017). Memory and Forgetting in the Post-Holocaust Era. The Ethics of Never Again. London: Routledge.
5. Bucholc, M., Komornik, M. (2019). The Polish ‘Holocaust Law’ revisited: The Devastating Effects of Prejudice-Mongering. Cultures of History Forum, https://www.cultures-of-history.unijena.de/politics/ [last access: 10.05.2020].