General trends in the development of American historiography in line with the pragmatic turn

Author:

Egorov Denis Ivanovich

Abstract

The pragmatic turn and the philosophy of pragmatism in versions X. Putnam and R. Bernstein are presented in the form of general epistemological attitudes of the most promising areas of historical thought in the United States. Under their methodological influence, everyday practices and the historical experience of rationalization of activities were at the center of research interests. Ideas about the relationship between macro and micro levels of historical reality have changed, determinism has been abandoned, new forms of historical description have appeared. The author's goal is to reveal the content of these concepts, to determine their role in specific research areas, as well as to try to characterize the specifics of the American version of the pragmatic turn. In the first part of the article, the analysis of the most significant trends for the development of historical science in the USA related to the correction of ideological ideas and cognitive principles of the philosophy of pragmatism is carried out. In the second part of the article, the key theses, concepts, conceptual and terminological apparatus of the works of leading experts on transnational, social, environmental, and legal history are correlated with the theoretical provisions of the pragmatic turn in social and humanitarian knowledge. A multidimensional review of the development of modern American historiography is presented. The ways of resolving previous scientific contradictions and constructing new variants of national identity, ways of updating the methodological arsenal and updating historical knowledge are described.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference29 articles.

1. Gul'bin G. K. Filosofiya istorii amerikanskoi novoi sotsial'noi istorii i ee znanievye problemy // Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. T. 307, № 1, 2004. S. 161-164.

2. Lubskii A.V. Pragmaticheskii povorot v istoricheskom poznanii // Teoriya i metodologiya istoricheskoi nauki. Terminologicheskii slovar'. Otv. red. A.O. Chubar'yan. M.: 2014. C. 405-407.

3. Nesh R. Dikaya priroda i amerikanskii razum. Kiev. Kievskii ekologo-kul'turnyi tsentr. / Per. s angl. Kiev: Kievskii ekologo-kul'turnyi tsentr, 2001.

4. Patnem. Kh. Razum, istina i istoriya / Per. s angl. T.A. Dmitrieva, M.V. Lebedeva. M.: Praksis, 2002.

5. Repina L.P. Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XXXXI vv.: sotsial'nye teorii i istoriograficheskaya praktika. – M.: Krug'', 2011.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3