Abstract
Body armor is critical to mitigating penetrating injuries and saving soldiers' lives. However, ballistic impacts to body armor can cause back deformation (BFD), posing a serious threat of fatal injury on the battlefield. The study performs finite element modeling to evaluate the protection of body armor panels. The numerical simulations consider various parameters, including impact velocities, and angles of projectile impact, which are used to estimate the residual velocity and damage patterns of the composite laminate. The simulations are carried out using the LS-DYNA code based on finite element analysis. The main results of the research reveal crucial insights into the ballistic behavior of composite materials with sisal and glass fibers. The study identifies specific responses, damage development patterns, and comparative analyses between sisal and fiberglass composites. The results have practical implications for the development of advanced materials to improve ballistic protection.
Publisher
Syncsci Publishing Pte., Ltd.
Reference54 articles.
1. Badea SM, Lăzăroaie C, Zecheru T, et al. Methods And Criteria For Selecting The Suitable Materials To Achieve The New Ballistic Protection Vest Designed To Womens. International conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION. 2015, 21(3): 782-786. https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2015-0132
2. Pacek D, Zochowski P, Wisniewski A. Anti-trauma pads based on non-Newtonian materials for flexible bulletproof inserts[C]//Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Ballistics, Scotland, UK. 2016: 9-13.
3. Wiśniewski A, Pacek D, Zochowski P, et al. Optimization of the material systems with magnetorheological fluids. Proceedings-28th International Symposium on Ballistics, BALLISTICS 2014.
4. Crouch IG. Body armour – New materials, new systems. Defence Technology. 2019, 15(3): 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.02.002
5. Ansari MdM, Chakrabarti A. Ballistic Performance of Unidirectional Glass Fiber Laminated Composite Plate under Normal and Oblique Impact. Procedia Engineering. 2017, 173: 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.053