Maximal respiratory pressure after COVID‐19 compared with reference material in healthy adults: A prospective cohort study (The SECURe study)

Author:

Helt Thora Wesenberg1ORCID,Christensen Jan2,Berg Ronan M. G.134ORCID,Lund Thomas Kromann5,Kalhauge Anna6,Rönsholt Frederikke57,Podlekareva Daria7,Arndal Elisabeth8,Madsen Flemming9,Munkholm Mathias1,Hanel Birgitte1,Lebech Anne‐Mette710,Katzenstein Terese Lea7,Mortensen Jann110

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Center for Physical Activity Research Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

5. Department of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Radiology Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

7. Department of Infectious Diseases Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

8. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

9. Center for Clinical Research and Prevention Copenhagen University Hospital–Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Copenhagen Denmark

10. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAfter COVID‐19 long term respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function including maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) have been reported. However, no studies have looked at MIP and MEP in all disease groups and the reference materials collection methods differ substantially. We aimed to determine MIP and MEP in individuals after COVID‐19 infection with different disease severity using reference material of healthy control group obtained using the same standardized method. Patients with COVID‐19 were included March 2020–March 2021 at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. MIP and MEP were measured using microRPM. Predicted MIP and MEP were calculated using reference material obtained from 298 healthy adults aged 18–97 years using the same method. In SECURe, 145 participants were measured median 5 months after COVID‐19 diagnosis and of these 16% had reduced MIP and/or MEP. There was reduced spirometry and total lung capacity, but not reduced diffusion capacity in those with abnormal MIP and/or MEP compared with normal MIP and MEP. Of those with reduced MIP and/or MEP at 5 months, 80% still had reduced MIP and/or MEP at 12 months follow‐up. In conclusion, few have reduced MIP and/or MEP 5 months after COVID‐19 and little improvement was seen over time.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3