Affiliation:
1. Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; «City Multiprofile Hospital № 2»
2. Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
3. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University; «City Multiprofile Hospital № 2»
Abstract
A literature review in the article presents an analysis of the influence of endogenous and exogenous factors on quality of preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. The review shows significance of external and internal factors influencing blood samples at preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. Among the exogenous factors considered: phlebotomy, test tubes for samples, transportation and storage. A number of factors exist at this phase that significantly affect test results. We examined these aspects of phlebotomy process: staff training, disinfectant contamination, needle diameter, needle material contamination. The review considers possible contamination with tube components and the importance of choosing the right anticoagulants and excipients. Transportation and storage of biological samples can be a source of errors at the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing. We analyzed the problem of determining the stability of analytes during storage and aspects of transportation samples by modern means. Among the endogenous factors considered: hemolysis, lipemia, icterricity, cell metabolism.. Hemolysis is one of the most frequent consequences of errors at the preanalytical phase. We analyzed importance of choosing a method for identifying hemolized tubes and the heterogeneity of bias results on different analytical systems. The review shows contribution of various classes of lipoproteins to turbidity of sample, possible preanalytical errors and impact on analytical tests. We examined possible effects of high bilirubin concentrations on analyte measurements. In the review, we also examined metabolism of some cells and its effect on samples.
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Medical Laboratory Technology,General Medicine
Reference60 articles.
1. Raman G., Avendano E., Chen M. Update on Emerging Genetic Tests Currently Available for Clinical Use in Common Cancers, in Technology Assessment Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
2. Rohr U., Binder C., Dieterle T., Giusti F., Messina C., & Toerien E. et al. The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(3).
3. Lippi G., Banfi G., Church S., Cornes M., De Carli G., & Grankvist K. et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clinical Chemistry аnd Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2015; 53(3).
4. Lippi G., Cadamuro J. Novel Opportunities for Improving the Quality of Preanalytical Phase. A Glimpse to the Future? Journal оf Medical Biochemistry. 2017; 36(4): 293-300.
5. Simundic A. Preanalytical Phase – an updated review of the current evidence. Biochemia Medica. 2014; 6-6.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献