Abstract
This article engages in a visual critical semiotic analysis of Medellín street art and its interpretation as political action in the Colombian social mobilisation of 2021. I explore three epistemological turns towards a descriptive and contrastive methodology to contextualize street art and its transformative potential. Firstly, the spatial turn leads us to understand how space and street art function as a framework of life and conflict that challenges viewers socially and politically. Secondly, following Peirceʼs ideas, I reinter preted some images. I explain how they function as theoretical objects related to indices, signs and symbols. According to Mitchell's image turn, the image functions as a significant semantic unit. Thirdly, I read the political turn based on Rancièreʼs works in which he equates the political and the aesthetic as an act of visibility, always existing together at a conceptual and substantive level, and with which emancipation is objective. The article does not try to argue whether street art has a transformative power as this has been widely discussed in the literature. The article looks at street art that appeared in the context of the social mobilisation of 2021-2022, and partially in the context of the recent pandemic as a social transformation, the fact of which was proven by the recent elections.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference38 articles.
1. Agamben, G. 2020. Lʼinvenzione di unʼepidemia. Quodlibet. https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-l-invenzione-di-un-epidemia.
2. Amnesty International. 2021. Colombia, 1 July, www.amnesty.org/en/location/americas/southamerica/colombia/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI4v4juTa9wIVgYnICh3H9QRxEAAYASAAEgK0afD_BwE.
3. Andrzejewski, A. 2017. Authenticity Manifested: Street Art and Artification. Rivista di Estetica 64: 167-184.
4. Arendt, H. 2007. Responsabilidad colectiva. Barcelona: Paidós.
5. Bacharach, S. 2015. Street art and consent. British Journal of Aesthetics 55: 481-495.