Medical Confidentiality after Patient Death in Selected Civil and Common Law Systems

Author:

Bagan-Kurluta Katarzyna1ORCID,Drozdowska Urszula1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Uniwersytet w Białymstoku , Polska

Abstract

Abstract The paper presents problems related to medical confidentiality after the patient’s death. The reasons for the waiver of this secret need to be considered. To this end, the authors analysed Polish regulations of medical law and then compared them to selected European regulations: French and English law. The inspiration for describing these two legal orders were two media-highlighted cases of the publication of medical diaries after the deaths of people holding the highest state offices: Lord Moran and Dr. Claude Gubler. The first doctor published his memoirs concerning the state of health of the English statesman of World War II – Winston Churchill, while the second published his memoirs after the death of the French President – François Mitterrand. The authors describe the reaction of the law to these breaches of secrecy after the deaths of the patients, and confront them with the current regulations. The whole is crowned with conclusions resulting from the comparison of Polish, French and English law. The paper uses the dogmatic-legal and comparative methods.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference36 articles.

1. Alured Faunce T., Pilgrims in Medicine: Concience, Legalism and Human Rights: An Alegory of Medical Humanities, Foundational Virtues, Ethical Principles, Law and Human Rights in Medical Personal and Professional Development, Leiden 2005.

2. Banta N.M., Death and Privacy in the Digital Age, “North Carolina Law Review” 2016, vol. 94, nr 3.

3. Bergoignen-Esper C., Sargos P., Les grands arrêts du droit de la santé, Dalloz 2016.

4. Bosek L., W sprawie kwalifikacji więzi rodzinnej jako dobra osobistego (uwagi krytyczne na tle aktualnego orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego), „Forum Prawnicze” 2015, nr 3.

5. Choong K.A., Mifsud Bonnici J.P., Posthumous Medical Confidentiality: The Public Interest Conundrum, “European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance” 2014, 1(nr 2).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3