Affiliation:
1. Uniwersytet w Białymstoku , Polska
Abstract
Abstract
The paper presents problems related to medical confidentiality after the patient’s death. The reasons for the waiver of this secret need to be considered. To this end, the authors analysed Polish regulations of medical law and then compared them to selected European regulations: French and English law. The inspiration for describing these two legal orders were two media-highlighted cases of the publication of medical diaries after the deaths of people holding the highest state offices: Lord Moran and Dr. Claude Gubler. The first doctor published his memoirs concerning the state of health of the English statesman of World War II – Winston Churchill, while the second published his memoirs after the death of the French President – François Mitterrand. The authors describe the reaction of the law to these breaches of secrecy after the deaths of the patients, and confront them with the current regulations. The whole is crowned with conclusions resulting from the comparison of Polish, French and English law. The paper uses the dogmatic-legal and comparative methods.
Reference36 articles.
1. Alured Faunce T., Pilgrims in Medicine: Concience, Legalism and Human Rights: An Alegory of Medical Humanities, Foundational Virtues, Ethical Principles, Law and Human Rights in Medical Personal and Professional Development, Leiden 2005.
2. Banta N.M., Death and Privacy in the Digital Age, “North Carolina Law Review” 2016, vol. 94, nr 3.
3. Bergoignen-Esper C., Sargos P., Les grands arrêts du droit de la santé, Dalloz 2016.
4. Bosek L., W sprawie kwalifikacji więzi rodzinnej jako dobra osobistego (uwagi krytyczne na tle aktualnego orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego), „Forum Prawnicze” 2015, nr 3.
5. Choong K.A., Mifsud Bonnici J.P., Posthumous Medical Confidentiality: The Public Interest Conundrum, “European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance” 2014, 1(nr 2).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献