Affiliation:
1. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of academic and applied approaches to analyze the problem of economic growth since the mid-XX century. For quite an extended period of time, these views were corresponding to universalist economic policies taking no adequate account of particularities and limitations that a certain catching-up economy embodied. New approaches analyzing the problems of economic growth, on the contrary, individualize growth diagnostics, structural transformation and the organization of reforms processes for the emerging economies. We argue that individualist approaches might be potentially more effective than the universalist ones for solving the problem of slow economic growth.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference59 articles.
1. Aleksashenko S. V. (2019). Russian economic miracle: What went wrong? Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
2. Gelman V. Y. (2017). Politics versus policy: The technocratic traps of post-Soviet reforms (Preprint M-55/17). St. Petersburg: European University in St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
3. Kudrin A., Gurvich E. (2014). A new growth model for the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No 12, pp. 4—36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-12-4-36
4. Zamulin O. A., Sonin K. I. (2019). Economic growth: Nobel prize in economic sciences 2018 and the lessons for Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 11—36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-1-11-36
5. Kazakova M. V., Lyubimov I. L., Nesterova K. V. (2016). Does a single reform’s success ensure faster growth? Weak institutions as a cause of reform failure. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 624—654. (In Russian).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献