Author:
Jabari Reem,Farrah Mohammed
Abstract
It is not surprising that most institutes, schools, and universities are shifting from traditional learning to online learning due to the coronavirus, which is an international concern that has changed the educational system all over the world. This study aims to investigate the perception of EFL students at Hebron University about online assessment benefits and challenges during COVID-19. The participants of this study were 64 English major students from Hebron University. An online questionnaire consisting of 40 questions was used to collect the data. The researchers followed the quantitative approach. According to the findings of this study, Students' overall view of e-assessment was moderate. The researcher included in the questionnaire eight domains. They got varying degrees. Compatibility domain (M=3.74), awareness domain (M=3.71), self-efficacy domain (M=3.57), perceived usefulness domain (M=3.53), IT support domain (M=3.48), perceived ease of use domain (M=3.48), peer influence and superior influence domain (M= 3.41), resource facilitation domain (M=3.20).
Publisher
Asian Research Association
Reference28 articles.
1. Abduh, M. (2021). Full-time Online Assessment during COVID -19 Lockdown: EFL Teachers' Perceptions. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 28(1).
2. Alruwais N., Wills G., Wald M., (2018). Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34-37.
3. Arif, Z. (2020). Online Assessment Implemented by English Teachers at Sma Al-Islam 1 Surakarta During Pandemic Covid-19. English Language Education Culture and Language Faculty the State Islamic Institute of Surakarta. http://eprints.iain-surakarta.ac.id/138/1/FINAL%20Thesis%20of%20Zulvan%20Arif%20153221230.pdf
4. Astiandani, F., Anam, S. (2021). EFL Teachers' Perceptions Towards the Implementation of Online Formative Assessment Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic. ELT Worldwide, 8(2), 269-277.
5. Buchanan, T., (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous?, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 148–154. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.148