Author:
Tapias- Hernández Fabián Andrés,Moreno Rosangela Barros Zanoni Lopes
Abstract
The surfactant-polymer (SP) process is one of the Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (CEOR) methods used in the industry. It has been continuously studied; however, it is still a challenge for the petroleum industry due to the difficulty to design the solution to be injected and forecast process performance. This paper is intended to contribute to the design of fluids used in an SP process based on some previously known properties and conditions. Hence, reservoir and fluid properties of a Colombian Field were used as reference parameters to select the polymer and surfactant. Then, the effects of salts, temperature, and surfactant on tailor-made polymer solutions were determined through a rheological study. Ostwald-de Waele and Carreau-Yasuda models adjusted the measured viscosity data against shear rate, while Arrhenius equation fitted viscosity values at 7,8 s-1 against temperature. The surfactant performance was analyzed using phase behavior tests, and the Chun Huh equations determined the interfacial tension (IFT) values. The Bancroft’s rule was used as a qualitative verification tool of the kind of micro- emulsion formed. From rheology, we concluded that the viscous modulus is predominant for all polymer solutions, and the fluid thickness is reduced due to the presence of divalent cations and raise on temperature, salts or surfactant concentration. On the other hand, the observed phase behavior corresponded to a transition Winsor II to I without finding any Winsor III micro-emulsion. Therefore, some criteria were proposed to select the optimal conditions. For the desired conditions, the reduction of IFT reached values ranging in magnitudes of 10-3 to 10-4 [mN/m]. These values are usually associated with an improved oil recovery factor.
Publisher
Instituto Colombiano del Petroleo
Subject
General Energy,General Chemical Engineering,Geology,Geophysics,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference81 articles.
1. EOR Screening Criteria Revisited - Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects, SPE Reserv;Taber;Eng,1997
2. [2]Lake, L. W., (1991). Enhanced Oil Recovery, Facsimile. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
3. [3]Shandrygin, A. and A. Lutfullin, (2008). Current Status of Enhanced Recovery Techniques in the Fields of Russia, SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib., (September 2008), 21-24.
4. [4]Sheng, J. J., (2011). Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery. Elsevier.
5. [5]Stoll, W. M. et al., (2011). Alkaline / Surfactant / Polymer Flood : From the Laboratory to the Field, SPE Reserv. Eng., 14(6), 702-712.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献