Affiliation:
1. School of Integrated Science and Education, University of Education, Winneba-Ghana
2. School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, PR China
Abstract
The purpose of this research paper is to investigate the impact of project-based learning on students' scientific reasoning skills and credence. The study's pre-exam and post-exam model was single group. 40 students from a public-school 8th grade students participated in the study during the spring 2021-2022 school year. The "Scientific Reasoning Exam Skills - SRES" was used to gauge the scientific reasoning abilities of the students before “Life science and Physical Science” course was taught using the research-project based learning approach and the SRES as a final progress check results. The 26 elements in this test are divided into 6 sub-categories Project-based learning is a student-centred approach that promotes active learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving through the exploration of scientific phenomena. This was accomplished in order to have a very solid result which will help schools to re-think in their curriculum design to make it more student-centered rand pee to peer rather than teacher centered. The results of the study's sub-problems can be summarized as follows: according to the sub-categories of proportional thinking, Hypothetical thinking, Probabilistic thinking and correlative thinking a significant difference was found between the SRES pre-exam total scores and post-exam total scores in favor of the pre-exam total scores. According to the sub-dimensions controlling variables and combinational thinking, there was no statistically significant difference in the pre-exam total scores. Between the SRES pre-exam and post-exam total scores of boys and girls students, there was no discernible difference. Only the combinational Thinking and correlative thinking sub-dimension showed a significant difference in the total scores of the SRES sub-dimensions.
Reference72 articles.
1. Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (2008). Inquiry in the Classroom: Realities and Opportunities. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
2. Ajewole, G. A. (1991). Effects of discovery and expository instructional methods on the attitude of students to biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(May), 401-409.
3. Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an Inquiry-Based Approach Known as the Science Writing Heuristic to Traditional Science Teaching Practices: Are There Differences? International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1745-1765.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science, W., DC. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. District of Columbia: Oxford University Press, 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4314.
5. Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-2.