Affiliation:
1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Abstract
In public-private partnerships (PPPs), governments sometimes may not afford the guarantees in full as initially agreed upon due to limited fiscal budgets. Accordingly, government overcommitment can occur. The degree of government overcommitment fulfillment affects not only the incentives provided by governments but also investors’ willingness to cooperate and efforts. However, until now, this government overcommitment risk has been ignored during negotiations. Moreover, little attention has been paid to the impact of investors’ fairness preference. To this end, this paper constructs an incentive mechanism of government overcommitment based on investors’ fairness preference in the horizontal and vertical dimensions. The results show that the optimal strategies of both sides are usually affected by the degree of government overcommitment fulfillment, investors’ fairness preference and their willingness to cooperate. Contrary to intuition, the optimal incentive of governments and investors’ efforts do not always increase with the decreasing degree of government overcommitment fulfillment, and thus, fairness preferences should be considered. It is not always the case that a higher-level government overcommitment fulfillment is better for themselves. The findings contribute new insights to the incentive mechanism to innovatively work toward creating an effective contract to pay more attention to government overcommitment risk in advance in PPPs.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Reference38 articles.
1. Buyukyoran, F., & Gundes, S. (2018). Optimized real options-based approach for government guarantees in PPP toll road projects. Construction Management and Economics, 36(4), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1347267
2. Cao, Q., Sheng, Z., Zhou, J., & Liu, H. (2016). Research on multi-task and incentive mechanism of public-private partnerships based on fairness preference. Forecasting, 35(01), 75-80.
3. Carbonara, N., Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2014a). Concession period for PPPs: A win-win model for a fair risk sharing. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1223-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.007
4. Carbonara, N., Costantino, N., & Pellegrino, R. (2014b). Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: A fair risk allocation model. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4), 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.906638
5. Chang, Y., & Wang, S. (2018). Profit allocation of PPP project from the perspective of incentives - The case of Chinese enterprises' investment in the infrastructure projects of GMS countries under the support of Asian infrastructure investment bank. Management Review, 30(11), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2018.11.024