Experimental consolidation and absolute measurement of the $$^\text {nat}$$C(p,x)$$^{11}$$C nuclear activation cross section at 100 MeV for particle therapy physics
-
Published:2021-08
Issue:8
Volume:57
Page:
-
ISSN:1434-6001
-
Container-title:The European Physical Journal A
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur. Phys. J. A
Author:
Bäcker Claus Maximilian,Horst Felix,Adi Wihan,Bäumer Christian,Gerhardt Marcel,Jentzen Walter,Kazek Sandra Laura,Kröninger Kevin,Schuy Christoph,Verbeek Nico,Weingarten Jens,Wulff Jörg,Timmermann Beate
Abstract
AbstractThe $$^\text {nat}$$
nat
C(p,x)$$^{11}$$
11
C reaction has been discussed in detail in the past [EXFOR database, Otuka et al. (Nuclear Data Sheets 120:272–276, 2014)]. However, measured activation cross sections by independent experiments are up to 15% apart. The aim of this study is to investigate underlying reasons for these observed discrepancies between different experiments and to determine a new consensus reference cross section at 100 MeV. Therefore, the experimental methods described in the two recent publications [Horst et al. (Phys Med Biol https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab4511, 2019) and Bäcker et al. (Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res B 454:50–55, 2019)] are compared in detail and all experimental parameters are investigated for their impact on the results. For this purpose, a series of new experiments is performed. With the results of the experiments a new reference cross section of (68±3) mb is derived at (97±3) MeV proton energy. This value combined with the reliably measured excitation function could provide accurate cross section values for the energy region of proton therapy. Because of the well-known gamma-ray spectrometer used and the well-defined beam characteristics of the treatment machine at the proton therapy center, the experimental uncertainties on the absolute cross section could be reduced to 3%. Additionally, this setup is compared to the in-beam measurement setup from the second study presented in the literature (Horst et al. 2019). Another independent validation of the measurements is performed with a PET scanner.
Funder
Mercator Research Center Ruhr
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Reference34 articles.
1. R.L. Aamodt, V. Peterson, R. Phillips, C$$^{12}$$(p, pn)C$$^{11}$$ cross section from threshold to 340 MeV. Phys. Rev. 88(4), 739–744 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.88.739 2. T. Akagi, M. Yagi, T. Yamashita, M. Murakami, Y. Yamakawa, K. Kitamura, K. Ogura, K. Kondo, S. Kawanishi, Experimental study for the production cross sections of positron emitters induced from 12C and 16O nuclei by low-energy proton beams. Radiat. Meas. 59, 262–269 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.07.005 3. P. Andreo, D.T. Burns, K. Hohlfeld, M.S. Huq, T. Kanai, F. Laitano, V. Smyth, S. Vynckier, Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy Technical Reports Series No. 398, v.12 edn. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2006) 4. A. Aricò, G. Battistoni, F. Cerutti, F. Horst, A. Mairani, C. Schuy, U. Weber, A. Ferrari, Benchmarking of FLUKA production cross sections of positron emission tomography isotopes for in-vivo range verification in hadron therapy. EPJ Web Conf. 239, 24001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023924001 5. C.M. Bäcker, C. Bäumer, M. Gerhardt, K. Kröninger, C. Nitsch, H.M. Siregar, B. Timmermann, N. Verbeek, J. Weingarten, J. Wulff, A. Yazgan, Measurement of nuclear activation cross section of protons on natural carbon from proton beam energies between 100 and 220 mev. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B 454, 50–55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2019.06.011
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|