Abstract
An experiment was conducted using thirty-eight tomato genotypes to evaluate the performance of different morphological and biochemical traits and their genetic analysis. An analysis of variance showed a high level of variation among all genotypes. Chlorophyll content (1st leaf), number of seed/fruit, ascorbic acid content in red fruit, lycopene, and beta-carotene content in red fruit showed high heritability along with a high percentage of genetic advance, which indicates selection can improve these traits. Other traits show moderate heritability and a moderate GA%. For most characters, phenotypic coefficient variance is higher than genotypic coefficient variance, indicating the influence of the environment is greater than genetic influence. Red fruit weight shows a positive and significant correlation with yield/plant. Path coefficient analysis revealed that the soluble solid content of red fruit exocarp and endocarp had a direct positive effect on yield/plant. Principal component analysis showed six principal components contributing 77.45% of the total variability of different traits. Cluster analysis grouped 38 genotypes into five clusters, where clusters V and III had the maximum genotypes. The dendrogram showed cluster V had the highest amount of variation. Two-way cluster heat map showed five clusters for genotypes and two groups for variable. Mean performance showed genotype CL5915- 153 D4-3-6-0 has the highest yield/plant and the highest weight of red fruit; genotype TC0277 has high soluble solid content in endocarp of red fruit; and genotypes Bupribig and Homeastid were superior for ascorbic acid, lycopene and beta-carotene content, which can be considered superior genotypes having important fruit quality traits.
Reference20 articles.
1. Aditya, J. P., & Bhartiya, A. (2013). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for quantitative characters in rainfed upland rice of Uttarakhand Hills.
2. Behera, M., Jagadev, P., Das, S., Pradhan, K., & Sahoo, B. (2020). Assessment of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in Tomato. Int. J. Chem. Studies, 8, 481-83. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4h.10319
3. Chernet, S., Belew, D., & Abay, F. (2014). Genetic diversity studies for quantitative traits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) genotypes in Western Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 6(9), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2014.0470
4. Dar, R. A., & Sharma, J. P. (2011). Genetic variability studies of yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 5(2), 168-174. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2011.168.174
5. FAOSTAT (2017): Area and production data of tomato in India. – FAO-STAT database, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.