Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is the preferred clinical treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Alteplase is an intravenous thrombolytic drug used in clinical practice. Recently, studies have shown the efficacy of another intravenous thrombolytic drug, tenecteplase, and have reported that the risk of bleeding is low. However, at present, Chinese and international research has yielded controversial results regarding the efficacy and risks of tenecteplase. Therefore, this systematic review and meta- analysis of the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase were performed. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, the Wanfang Database and CNKI were searched for all studies on the thrombolytic treatment of acute ischemic stroke. All studies published in English prior to March 2021 were retrieved. The studies were screened and selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, the data were extracted and recorded by trained researchers. RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used to analyze the data on the 24h recanalization rate, early neurological improvement (24h reduction in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of at least 8 points or 24 h NIHSS score of 0~1 point), mRS score at 90 days, intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in the tenecteplase group and alteplase group. Results: A total of 565 related studies were identified through the initial searches in each database. The citations of meta-analyses and related reviews were screened for additional eligible articles. Eventually, 9 high-quality English-language articles that included 2149 patients with acute ischemic stroke (including 1035 in the tenecteplase group and 1046 in the alteplase group)were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results were as follows: (1) Efficacy: The 24 h recanalization rate with regard to vascular recanalization was significantly better in the tenecteplase group than in the alteplase group(OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.23~2.72, z = 2.97, P = 0.003). There was significantly greater improvement in early neurological function in the tenecteplase group than in the alteplase group (OR= 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11~1.63, Z=3.00, P =0.003). There were no significant differences in 90-day mRS scores between the two groups (mRS score =0-1, OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.99~1.46, z = 1.82, p = 0.07; mRS score =0-2, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.94~1.45, z = 1.38, p = 0.17). However, the subgroup analysis showed that the 90-day mRS score of the 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase group was significantly different from that of groups treated with other doses of tenecteplase (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01~2.03, z = 2.03, p = 0.04). (2) Safety: The incidences of any intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.91, 95% Ci: 0.55~1.49, z = 0.39, p = 0.70), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.63~2.32, z = 0.56 P = 0.57), and mortality (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.57~1.26, z = 0.82, p = 0.41) were not significantly different between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups. Conclusions: Tenecteplase can significantly increase the 24-hour vascular recanalization rate and improve the neurological prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke and it does not increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage or mortality.