Abstract
Responsibility – as an analytic or topic of political debate – is out of vogue in critical housing studies. Rather than offering progressive potential, the call for responsibility has been seen to foster neoliberal governance, racial structural violence, and forms of dependency. Conversely, this paper posits that a critical engagement with notions of responsibility can provide a domain for critique, everyday engagement, and legal political struggle against housing injustice when the concept’s foundational premises are radically revised.
Reference75 articles.
1. Der privatrechtliche Diskurs der Moderne revisited;Auer;Kritische Justiz 53(1),2020
2. Displacement in "actually existing" racial neoliberalism: refugee governance in Paris;Bhagat;Urban Geography (42),2021
3. Ways of relating: hospitality and the acknowledgement of otherness;Barnett;Progress in Human Geography (29),2005
4. Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, (Cambridge: Polity Press).
5. Berger, M. & Moritz, B., (2018) Inclusive urbanism as gatekeeping, in: M. Berger, B. Moritz, L. Carlier, M. Ranzato (Eds.) Designing Urban Inclusion, (Metrolab: Online).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The politics of new urban ruins;Space and Polity;2023-09-18