Health comparison between guinea pigs raised in uncontrolled and controlled environments
-
Published:2022-06-29
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1575-1582
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Fitria Laksmindra1ORCID, Wijayanti Nastiti1ORCID, Arisuryanti Tuty2ORCID, Salasia Siti Isrina Oktavia3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Department of Tropical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 2. Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding, Department of Tropical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 3. Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Guinea pigs (GPs) (Cavia porcellus) are not only kept as pets but also widely used in biological and biomedical research. At present, GPs are also used as a species for animal-assisted therapy (AAT). Consequently, assessing their health status is vital to determining their quality of life, usability for research, and prevention of spread of potential zoonotic diseases to patients using them for AAT. GPs are mainly sourced from animal markets supplied by traditional farms, where environmental factors and sanitation are not properly controlled. This study aimed to compare health status between GPs raised in uncontrolled (conventional farm) and controlled (animal facility) environments.
Materials and Methods: Sample animals were obtained from a local animal market and transported to an animal facility. After 1 week of acclimatization, the health status of the animals, including general health condition, body weight, body temperature, complete blood count, liver function (alanine aminotransferase and bilirubin), renal function (blood urea nitrogen and creatinine), and presence of ectoparasites and endoparasites, was assessed. Then, the animals were maintained in the animal facility following the standard procedure for laboratory animals. After 2 months, the animals' health status was re-examined, assessing the same parameters.
Results: Based on the evaluated parameters, GPs raised in an uncontrolled environment were found to have poorer health status than those raised in a controlled environment. There were significant differences in almost all parameters between GPs raised in controlled and uncontrolled environments. We found that the populations of two ectoparasites, Gyropus ovalis and Gliricola porcelli, and one endoparasite, Eimeria caviae>, decreased significantly following the movement of the animals from an uncontrolled to a controlled environment.
Conclusion: GPs raised in an uncontrolled environment have poor health status. However, a controlled environment with better care management can improve the health status of GPs.
Funder
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference54 articles.
1. Lord, E., Collins, C., de France, S., LeFebvre, M.J., Pigière, F., Eeckhout, P., Erauw, C., Fitzpatrick, S.M., Healy, P.F., Martínez-Polanco, M.F., Garcia, J.L., Roca, E.R., Delgado, M., Urriago, A.S., Léon, G.A.P., Toyne, J.M., Dahlstedt, A., Moore, K.M., Diaz, C.L., Zori, C. and Matisoo-Smith, E. (2020) Ancient DNA of Guinea Pigs (Cavia spp.) indicates a probable new center of domestication and pathways of global distribution. Sci. Rep., 10(1): 8901. 2. Kusukawa, S. (2010) The sources of Gessner’s pictures for the historia animalium. Ann. Sci., 67(3): 303–328. 3. Pritt, S. (2012) Guinea pig: Taxonomy and history. In: Suckow, M.A., Stevens, K.A. and Wilson, R.P., editors. The Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents. Academic Press, Elsevier Inc., New York. p563–574. 4. Shomer, N.H., Holcombe, H. and Harkness, J.E. (2015) Biology and diseases of guinea pigs. In: Fox, J.G., Anderson, L.C., Otto, G.M., Pritchett-Corning, K.R. and Whary, M.T., editors. Laboratory Animal Medicine. Elsevier Inc., Academic Press, New York. p247–283. 5. Gad, S.C. and Peckham, J. (2016) The guinea pig. In: Gad, S.C., editor. Animal Models in Toxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton. p343–384.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|