Epizootiological monitoring of wolf helminths in Northern and Central Kazakhstan
-
Published:2024-07
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1648-1654
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Uakhit Rabiga1ORCID, Smagulova Ainura2ORCID, Lider Lyudmila1ORCID, Leontyev Sergey2ORCID, Kiyan Vladimir2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan; Laboratory of Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, National Center for Biotechnology, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan. 2. Laboratory of Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, National Center for Biotechnology, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Wolves (Canis lupus) play a role in nature, including the regulation of the number of ungulates and the use of dead animals. In addition, wolves are a natural link and carrier for the spread of many parasitic invasions. Hence, the main task in preventing the spread of parasitic invasions is to regulate the wolf population. This study aimed to monitor the endoparasitological fauna of wild wolves inhabiting Northern and Central Kazakhstan.
Materials and Methods: Overall, 81 wolves were investigated for parasitic worms using the K. I. Scriabin method. Wolf intestinal materials were collected from the following six regions: North Kazakhstan, Pavlodar, Kostanay, Akmola, Ulytau, and Karaganda. The genetic diversity of the parasites was identified using a polymerase chain reaction with specific primers. After data collection, a comprehensive statistical analysis was performed.
Results: Several helminth types were identified in wolves, including Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia hydatigena, Mesocestoides spp., Toxascaris leonina, Trichinella nativa, Alaria alata, and Dirofilaria repens. Based on the results of this study, young male wolves aged 1–4 years were the most vulnerable to helminthiasis. Wolves living in steppe and semi-desert regions are often exposed to helminth infections. The prevalence of T. nativa in the wolves was 20.4%. This study also revealed the presence of echinococcosis among wolf populations in Karaganda and Kostanay, with prevalence rates of 4.1% and 4.7%, respectively. The overall prevalence of tapeworms in wolves was 54.3%.
Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of understanding the potential risks associated with helminth infections in wild carnivores because helminths can act as disease reservoirs and pose a threat to humans, livestock, and other wild carnivores. These results can contribute to the development of effective control and management strategies for helminth infections in wolves, which can infect humans and livestock.
Keywords: Echinococcus, epidemiology, helminth prevalence, Kazakhstan.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Reference40 articles.
1. Leontiev, S.V. (2018) Wolf situation as a biological resource in Kazakhstan. Buletin. NSAU, 1: 80-87. (Russian) 2. Brandell, E.E., Jackson, M.K., Cross, P.C., Piaggio, A.J., Taylor, D.R., Smith, D.W., Boufana, B., Stahler, D.R. and Hudson, P.J. (2022) Evaluating noninvasive methods for estimating cestode prevalence in a wild carnivore population. PLoS One, 17(11): e0277420. 3. Stronen, A.V., Molnar, B., Ciucci, P., Darimont, C.T., Grottoli, L., Paquet, P.C., Sallows, T., Smits, J.E.G. and Bryan, H.M. (2021) Cross-continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide-ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density. Ecol. Evol., 11(15): 10338–10352. 4. Lider, L.A., Leontyev, S.V., Akibekov, O.S., Ussenbayev, A.E., Seytkamzina, D.M., Erzhanova, N. and Uakhit, R. (2019) Helminth Fauna of Wild Canidae in Kazakhstan. In: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Intensification of Hunting and Development of National Types of Hunting”. Vol. 1, p54–57. 5. Kamiya, T., O’Dwyer, K., Nakagawa, S. and Poulin, R. (2014) What determines species richness of parasitic organisms? A meta-analysis across animal, plant and fungal hosts. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., 89(1): 123–134.
|
|