Comparative occurrence pattern of fractures in cattle and buffaloes

Author:

Yadav Ganga Prasad1,Sangwan Vandana1,Kumar Ashwani1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Abstract

Background and Aim: Dairy animals play an important role in the Indian economy. Knowledge of the occurrence pattern of long bone fractures in bovine may help in strategizing the possibilities of treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to find out the comparative occurrence pattern of fractures in cattle and buffaloes. Materials and Methods: A total of 278 fractures of bovine (171 in cattle and 107 in buffaloes), presented to the Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India, during a study of 1 year, were investigated for the occurrence pattern, in relation to species, age, body weight, gender, bone involved, type of fracture (closed or open), and the presentation of bovine as standing or in recumbent state. Results: The overall hospital occurrence of fractures in bovine was 4.24% and most of the fractures resulted from slipping and falling on hard floor. Of 278 fractures, the majority (90.28%) involved long bones (n=251; 103 buffaloes and 148 cattle). Forelimb fractures were recorded more common in buffaloes (64.08%), whereas the cattle suffered more of hind limb fractures (60.23%). Cattle also included 11 cases of bilateral fractures of metacarpal (n=3), tibia (n=1), radius and ulna (n=1), and mandible (n=6). Fracture of olecranon constituted 6.83% (n=19) and majority (n=15) were in buffaloes. The cattle had higher percent of open fractures (54.38%) as compared to that in buffaloes (17.76%). Marginally higher percentage of cattle (33.33%) suffering from fracture were recumbent as compared to buffaloes (23.36%) and femur fractures were found to be a leading cause of recumbency (100% in cattle and 75.00% in buffaloes). Conclusion: Species-specific differences in the occurrence pattern of fractures exist among cattle and buffaloes. Cattle are found to be more susceptible (1.5 times) to fractures as compared to buffaloes. The buffaloes are vulnerable to forelimb fractures while the cattle to the hind limb. As compared to forelimb, long bone fractures of hind limb are more commonly associated with recumbency in bovine. Cattle are more prone to mandible fractures and the open fractures of long bones as compared to buffaloes.

Funder

Indian Council of Agricultural Research

Publisher

Veterinary World

Subject

General Veterinary

Reference13 articles.

1. Velavan, A., Sivaraman, S. and Krishnakumar, K. (2014) Successful management of a compound fracture in a buffalo using a fabricated polyvinylchloride splint in a field setting. Buffalo Bull., 33(3): 246-250.

2. Jean, G.S. and Anderson, D.E. (2014) Decision analysis for fracture management in cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract., 30(1): 1-10.

3. Tulleners, E.P. (1986) Management of bovine orthopedic problems, Part I: Fractures. Compend. Contin. Educ. Pract. Vet., 8(3): S69-S79.

4. Sangwan, V., Mohindroo, J., Kumar, A. and Randhawa, C.S. (2018) Clinical, radiographic and ultrasonographic differences in the cows and buffaloes suffering from pericarditis. Int. J. Livest. Res., 8(5): 255-263.

5. Gangl, M., Grulke, S., Serteyn, D. and Touati, K. (2006) Retrospective study of 99 cases of bone fractures in cattle treated by external coaptation or confinement. Vet. Rec., 158(8): 264-268.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3