Molecular prevalence and factors associated with Ehrlichia canis infection in dogs from the North Pantanal wetland, Brazil
-
Published:2023-06
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1209-1213
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Pereira Mariana Elisa1ORCID, Canei Darlan Henrique1ORCID, Carvalho Matheus Roberto1ORCID, Dias Álvaro Felipe de Lima Ruy1ORCID, de Almeida Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira2ORCID, Nakazato Luciano2ORCID, Sousa Valéria Régia Franco2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Postgraduate Program in Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Avenue Fernando Correa da Costa, Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. 2. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Avenue Fernando Correa da Costa, Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis is a vector-borne disease caused by the obligatory intracellular bacterium Ehrlichia canis, which is distributed across tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. Its prevalence within dog populations is high in municipalities located across the Pantanal biome, but it remains unknown in Barão de Melgaço, Mato Grosso, Brazil. This study aimed to determine the molecular prevalence and factors associated with E. canis infection in dogs domiciled in Barão de Melgaço.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out to investigate the prevalence of E. canis infection in 369 dogs from urban and rural areas in Barão de Melgaço, North Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Initially, the dogs were examined, and, through a questionnaire, the risk factors were investigated. Blood samples were subjected to DNA extraction and PCR was performed to estimate the prevalence of E. canis infection.
Results: The molecular prevalence of E. canis infection in dogs was 42.5% and none of the studied variables were significantly associated with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: The high molecular prevalence demonstrates an increased transmission of the agent across the city. This also indicates that attention needs to be paid to E. canis infection and control measures should be introduced to prevent its transmission. The demographic and clinical risk factors commonly associated with E. canis infection in this study were not associated with PCR positivity.
Keywords: bacterium, DNA, dog, ehrlichiosis, Pantanal.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference27 articles.
1. Bezerra-Santos, M.A., Nguyen, V.L., Iatta, R., Manoj, R.R.S., Latrofa, M.S., Hodžić, A., Dantas-Torres, F., Mendoza-Roldan, J.A. and Otranto, D. (2021) Genetic variability of Ehrlichia canis TRP36 in ticks, dogs, and red foxes from Eurasia. Vet. Microbiol., 255(??? ): 109037. 2. Aziz, M.U., Hussain, S., Song, B., Ghauri, H.N., Zeb, J. and Sparagano, O.A. (2023) Ehrlichiosis in Dogs: A comprehensive review about the pathogen and its vectors with emphasis on South and East Asian Countries. Vet. Sci., 10(1): 21. 3. Makino, H., Sousa, V.R.F., Fujimori, M., Rodrigues, J.Y., Dias, A.F.L.R., Dutra, V., Nakazato, L. and Almeida, A.B.P.F. (2016) Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: A comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples. Cienc. Rural, 46(2): 310–314. 4. Bhoopathy, D. and Latha, B.R. (2018) Application of LAMP Assay for the diagnosis of Ehrlichia canis in dogs. Indian Vet. J., 95(1): 79–80. 5. Woody, B.J. and Hoskins, J.D. (1991) Ehrlichial diseases of dog. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract., 21(1): 75–98.
|
|