Utilizing Simulation to Evaluate Robotic Skill Acquisition and Learning Decay

Author:

Liu Shinban12,Watkins Kayla13,Hall Caroline E.1ORCID,Liu Yuki4,Lee Shih-Hao4,Papandria Dominic1,Delman Keith A.1,Srinivasan Jahnavi1,Patel Ankit1,Davis S. Scott1,Lin Edward1,Stetler Jamil1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Emory University

2. Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Atlanta, GA

3. General Surgery, Surgical Institute at True North, Duncan, OK

4. Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA

Abstract

Background: We aim to evaluate how new robotic skills are acquired and retained by having participants train and retest using exercises on the robotic platform. We hypothesized that participants with a 3-month break from the robotic platform will have less learning decay and increased retention compared with those with a 6-month break. Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial in which participants voluntarily enrolled and completed an initial training phase to reach proficiency in 9 robot simulator exercises. They were then instructed to refrain from practicing until they retested either 3 or 6 months later. This study was completed at an academic medical center within the general surgery department. Participants were medical students, and junior-level residents with minimal experience in robotic surgery were enrolled. A total of 27 enrolled, and 13 participants completed the study due to attrition. Results: Overall, intragroup analysis revealed that participants performed better in their retest phase compared with their initial training in terms of attempts to reach proficiency, time for completion, penalty score, and overall score. Specifically, during the first attempt in the retesting phase, the 3-month group did not deviate far from their final attempt in the training phase, whereas the 6-month group experienced significantly worse time to complete and overall score in interrupted suturing {[−4 (−18 to 20) seconds vs. 109 (55 to 118) seconds, P=0.02] [−1.3 (−8 to 1.9) vs. −18.9 (−19.5 to (−15.0)], P=0.04} and 3-arm relay {[3 (−4 to 23) seconds vs. 43 (30 to 50) seconds, P=0.02] [0.4 (−4.6 to 3.1) vs. −24.8 (−30.6 to (−20.3)], P=0.01] exercises. In addition, the 6-month group had a significant increase in penalty score in retesting compared with the 3-month group, which performed similarly to their training phase [3.3 (2.7 to 3.3) vs. 0 (−0.8 to 1.7), P=0.03]. Conclusions: This study identified statistically significant differences in learning decay, skills retention, and proficiency between 3-month and 6-month retesting intervals on a robotic simulation platform.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3