Affiliation:
1. Gastroenterology
2. Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences
3. Department of Gastroenterology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences
4. Department of General Medicine, King George Medical University, Lucknow
5. Department of Gastroenterology, IMS-BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Background and Aims:
The appropriate length of esophageal myotomy in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia cardia remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the outcome of short (≤3 cm) and long (≥6 cm) esophageal myotomy in patients with type I and II achalasia cardia.
Methods:
This single-blinded, randomized controlled noninferiority trial was conducted at a tertiary center between July 2021 and December 2021. Patients with achalasia types I and II were randomized into short (≤3 cm) and long (≥6 cm) esophageal myotomy groups. The primary outcome of the study was clinical success (Eckardt score ≤3) 1 year after the procedure. The secondary outcomes included a comparison of technical success, operating duration, occurrence of intraoperative adverse events, alterations in integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), change in barium column height after 5 minutes (1 mo), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (3 mo) between the groups.
Results:
Fifty-four patients were randomized into the short (n=27) or long (n=27) esophageal myotomy groups. Technical success rates were 100% (27/27) and 96.3% (26/27) in short myotomy (SM) and long myotomy (LM) groups, respectively. The clinical success rates were 96.3% (26/27) and 96.2% (25/26) in the SM and LM groups, respectively (P=0.998). The mean (±SD) length of the esophageal myotomy was 2.75±0.36 cm in the SM and 6.69±1.35 cm in the LM groups (P<0.001). The mean (±SD) procedure time for the SM and LM groups was 61.22±8.44 and 82.42±14.70 minutes (P<0.001), respectively. The mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), Eckardt score, adverse events, reflux esophagitis, symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease, and esophageal acid exposure (>6%) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups following POEM treatment.
Conclusions:
Short myotomy is noninferior to long myotomy in terms of clinical success, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and intraoperative adverse events at the short-term follow-up (P>0.05). Short myotomy resulted in a reduced operative time (P<0.05).
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)