Comparative efficacies of 13 surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Author:

Lee Yun Jeong12ORCID,Ha Ahnul34ORCID,Kang Donghwee2,Shim Sung Ryul5ORCID,Jeoung Jin Wook12ORCID,Park Ki Ho12ORCID,Kim Young Kook1267ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine

3. Department of Ophthalmology, Jeju National University Hospital

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju-si

5. Department of Health and Medical Informatics, Kyungnam University College of Health Sciences, Changwon, Korea

6. Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital

7. EyeLight Data Science Laboratory, Seoul

Abstract

Background: Timely and proper intraocular pressure (IOP) management is vital to the prevention of visual impairment in children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). Although various surgical interventions have been proposed, no well-founded evidence exists on their comparative efficacies. We aimed to compare the efficacies of surgical interventions for PCG. Methods: We searched relevant sources up to 4 April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) entailing surgical interventions for PCG in children were identified. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed, comparing 13 surgical interventions: Conventional partial trabeculotomy ([CPT] control), 240-degree trabeculotomy, Illuminated microcatheter-assisted circumferential trabeculotomy (IMCT), Viscocanalostomy, Visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy, Goniotomy, Laser goniotomy, Kahook dual blade ab-interno trabeculectomy, Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C, Trabeculectomy with modified scleral bed, Deep sclerectomy, Combined trabeculectomy-trabeculotomy with mitomycin C, and Baerveldt implant. The main outcomes were mean IOP reduction and surgical success rate at postoperative 6 months. The mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) were analyzed by a random-effects model, and the efficacies were ranked by P-score. We appraised the RCTs using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB) tool (PROSPERO: CRD42022313954). Results: Sixteen RCTs were eligible for NMA, including 710 eyes of 485 participants and 13 surgical interventions, which formed a network of 14 nodes comprising both single interventions and intervention combinations. IMCT was superior to CPT in both IOP reduction [MD (95% CI): −3.10 (−5.50 to −0.69)] and surgical success rate [OR (95% CI): 4.38 (1.61–11.96)]. The MD and OR comparing the other surgical interventions and intervention combinations with CPT were not statistically significant. The P-scores ranked IMCT as the most efficacious surgical intervention in terms of success rate (P-score =0.777). Overall, the trials had a low-to-moderate ROB. Conclusion: This NMA indicated that IMCT is more effective than CPT and might be the most efficacious of the 13 surgical interventions for management of PCG.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3