Amplitude Parameters Are Predictive of Hearing Preservation in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implant Surgery

Abstract

Objective To prospectively evaluate the association between hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI) and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters. Study Design Multi-institutional, prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting Ten high-volume, tertiary care CI centers. Patients Adults (n = 87) with sensorineural hearing loss meeting CI criteria (2018–2021) with audiometric thresholds of ≤80 dB HL at 500 Hz. Methods Participants were randomized to CI surgery with or without audible ECochG monitoring. Electrode arrays were inserted to the full-depth marker. Hearing preservation was determined by comparing pre-CI, unaided low-frequency (125-, 250-, and 500-Hz) pure-tone average (LF-PTA) to LF-PTA at CI activation. Three ECochG amplitude parameters were analyzed: 1) insertion track patterns, 2) magnitude of ECochG amplitude change, and 3) total number of ECochG amplitude drops. Results The Type CC insertion track pattern, representing corrected drops in ECochG amplitude, was seen in 76% of cases with ECochG “on,” compared with 24% of cases with ECochG “off” (p = 0.003). The magnitude of ECochG signal drop was significantly correlated with the amount of LF-PTA change pre-CI and post-CI (p < 0.05). The mean number of amplitude drops during electrode insertion was significantly correlated with change in LF-PTA at activation and 3 months post-CI (p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions ECochG amplitude parameters during CI surgery have important prognostic utility. Higher incidence of Type CC in ECochG “on” suggests that monitoring may be useful for surgeons in order to recover the ECochG signal and preventing potentially traumatic electrode–cochlear interactions.