Socioeconomic Disparities in the Pursuit of Care at a High-Volume Institution for Surgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas

Author:

Du Eric Y.,Assi Sahar H.,Moshtaghi Omid1,Schwartz Marc S.2,Friedman Rick A.1,Dixon Peter R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Abstract

Objective Increased institutional surgical resection case volume for vestibular schwannomas (VSs) has been associated with improved patient outcomes, including reduced risk of prolonged hospital stay and readmission. Socioeconomic disparities in the pursuit of care at these high-volume institutions remain unknown. Study Design Retrospective cohort epidemiological study. Setting National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry of over 1,500 facilities in the United States. Patients Adult VS patients (age, >18 years) treated surgically. Interventions High- versus low-volume facilities, defined using a facility case volume threshold of 25 cases per year. A risk-adjusted restricted cubic spline model was previously used to identify this risk threshold beyond which the incremental benefit of increasing case volume began to plateau. Main Outcome Measures Sociodemographic factors, including race, ethnicity, income, insurance status, and rurality. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics, including age, sex, Charlson–Deyo score, and tumor size. Results A totoal of 10,048 patients were identified (median [interquartile range] age = 51 [41–60] years, 54% female, 87% Caucasian). Patients with Spanish/Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52–0.96), income below median (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55–0.73]), and Medicare, Medicaid, or other government insurance versus private insurance (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53–0.74) had reduced odds of treatment at a high-volume facility. Further sensitivity analyses in which facility volume was operationalized continuously reinforced direction and significance of these associations. Conclusions Socioeconomic disparities exist in the propensity for VS patients to be treated at a high-volume facility. Further work is needed to understand the nature of these associations and whether interventions can be designed to mitigate them.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Sensory Systems,Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3