Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to Identify Potential Failures in a Psychiatric Hospital Emergency Department

Author:

Gur-Arieh Sharon1,Mendlovic Shlomo2,Rozenblum Ronen3,Magnezi Racheli1

Affiliation:

1. Health System Management Program, Department of Management, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan

2. Shalvata Medical Center, Hod Hasharon, Israel

3. Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Objectives Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a powerful tool for accessing potential failures, but the participants are limited. It has not been used in psychiatric hospitals. Objectives were to implement FMEA in a psychiatric hospital and determine whether the FMEA process can be expanded by including participants who are familiar with the emergency department (ED) admission process and those who are not. Methods In this prospective, questionnaire-based study, a multidisciplinary team experienced in ED admissions was trained in FMEA and determined potential failures in the process. They developed a questionnaire regarding the failures, which were ranked by 17 ED and 28 non-ED healthcare providers. Risk priority numbers were calculated for each. Results By applying FMEA, we found 6 steps of the ED admission process, with 32 potential failures. Risk priority numbers ranged from 91 to 225. The most notable potential failure identified was during a patient’s initial telephone call to the ED, before arrival. Emergency department and non-ED workers ranked 94% of the potential failures similarly. Conclusions Failure mode and effect analysis can be implemented in psychiatric hospitals and can be a useful tool for anticipating potential failures. The number of participants in an FMEA can be increased to include those who are not directly involved in the process and should involve several specialists from diverse fields. Increasing the number of participants allows more detailed analyses. A checklist detailing the actions to take when processing a patient’s initial phone call should be implemented to decrease hazards related to ED admissions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Leadership and Management

Reference28 articles.

1. Assessment and risk management of potential hazards by failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) method in Yazd steel complex;Open J Safety Sci Technol,2014

2. Using the failure mode and effects analysis model to improve parathyroid hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone testing;Risk Manag Healthc Policy,2016

3. Engaging staff to improve quality and safety in an austere medical environment: a case-control study in two Sierra Leonean hospitals;Int J Quality Health Care,2015

4. Occupational safety theories, models and metaphors in the three decades since World War II, in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands: a literature review;Saf Sci,2014

5. Reducing inpatient suicide risk: using human factors analysis to improve observation practices;J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3