Identifying Contributing Factors Associated With Dental Adverse Events Through a Pragmatic Electronic Health Record–Based Root Cause Analysis

Author:

Kalenderian Elsbeth,Bangar Suhasini1,Yansane Alfa2,Tran Duong1,Sedlock Emily1,Xiao Yan3,Urata Janelle2,Olson Greg1,Franklin Amy4,Kookal Krishna1,Ibarra-Noriega Ana1,Tungare Sayali1,Tokede Oluwabunmi1,Spallek Heiko5,White Joel M.2,Walji Muhammad F.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Dentistry, Houston, Texas

2. University of California at San Francisco School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California

3. University of Texas at Arlington, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arlington, Texas

4. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, Texas

5. University of Sydney School of Dentistry, Surry Hills, Australia

Abstract

Objective This study assessed contributing factors associated with dental adverse events (AEs). Methods Seven electronic health record–based triggers were deployed identifying potential AEs at 2 dental institutions. From 4106 flagged charts, 2 reviewers examined 439 charts selected randomly to identify and classify AEs using our dental AE type and severity classification systems. Based on information captured in the electronic health record, we analyzed harmful AEs to assess potential contributing factors; harmful AEs were defined as those that resulted in temporary moderate to severe harm, required hospitalization, or resulted in permanent moderate to severe harm. We classified potential contributing factors according to (1) who was involved (person), (2) what were they doing (tasks), (3) what tools/technologies were they using (tools/technologies), (4) where did the event take place (environment), (5) what organizational conditions contributed to the event? (organization), (6) patient (including parents), and (7) professional-professional collaboration. A blinded panel of dental experts conducted a second review to confirm the presence of an AE. Results Fifty-nine cases had 1 or more harmful AEs. Pain occurred most frequently (27.1%), followed by nerve injury (16.9%), hard tissue injury (15.2%), and soft tissue injury (15.2%). Forty percent of the cases were classified as “temporary not moderate to severe harm.” Person (training, supervision, and fatigue) was the most common contributing factor (31.5%), followed by patient (noncompliance, unsafe practices at home, low health literacy, 17.1%), and professional-professional collaboration (15.3%). Conclusions Pain was the most common harmful AE identified. Person, patient, and professional-professional collaboration were the most frequently assessed factors associated with harmful AEs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Leadership and Management

Reference29 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3