Differential Perceptions of Noninvasive Ventilation in Intensive Care among Medical Caregivers, Patients, and Their Relatives

Author:

Schmidt Matthieu123,Boutmy-Deslandes Emmanuelle4,Perbet Sébastien5,Mongardon Nicolas6,Dres Martin37,Razazi Keyvan8,Guerot Emmanuel9,Terzi Nicolas10,Andrivet Pierre11,Alves Mikael12,Sonneville Romain13,Cracco Christophe14,Peigne Vincent15,Collet Francois16,Sztrymf Benjamin17,Rafat Cedric18,Reuter Danielle19,Fabre Xavier20,Labbe Vincent21,Tachon Guillaume22,Minet Clémence23,Conseil Matthieu24,Azoulay Elie25,Similowski Thomas123,Demoule Alexandre326

Affiliation:

1. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1158 “Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique,” Paris, France

2. INSERM, UMR_S 1158 “Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique,” Paris, France

3. AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation Médicale (Département “R3S”), Paris, France

4. Hôpital Saint Louis, Service de Biostatistique, Paris, France

5. Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Clermont Ferrand, France

6. Hôpital Cochin, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France

7. Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Bicêtre, France

8. Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, DHU A-TVB, Service de Réanimation Médicale, CARMAS Research Group 51, Créteil, France

9. Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France

10. INSERM, U1075, and Université de Caen, and CHRU Caen, Service de Réanimation Médicale, and CHU Caen, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Caen, France

11. Hôpital de Bligny, Service de Réanimation, Bligny, France

12. Hôpital Saint Antoine, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France

13. Hôpital Bichat–Claude-Bernard, Service de Réanimation Médicale et des Maladies Infectieuses, Paris, France

14. Hôpital d’Angoulême, Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Angoulême, France

15. Hôpital Percy, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Clamart, France

16. Hôpital de Saint Malo, Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Saint Malo, France

17. Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Clamart, France

18. Hôpital Louis Mourier, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Colombes, France

19. Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France

20. Hôpital de Roanne, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Roanne, France

21. Hôpital Tenon, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Paris, France

22. Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Clamart, France

23. Hôpital Albert Michalon, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Grenoble, France

24. Hôpital universitaire Saint Eloi, Service de Réanimation et d Anesthésiologie, Montpellier, France

25. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 974, Paris, France

26. INSERM, UMR_S 974, F-75005, Paris, France

Abstract

Abstract Background Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) requires a close “partnership” between a conscious patient and the patient’s caregivers. Specific perceptions of NIV stakeholders and their impact have been poorly described to date. The objectives of this study were to compare the perceptions of NIV by intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, nurses, patients, and their relatives and to explore factors associated with caregivers’ willingness to administer NIV and patients’ and relatives’ anxiety in relation to NIV. Methods This is a prospective, multicenter questionnaire-based study. Results Three hundred and eleven ICU physicians, 752 nurses, 396 patients, and 145 relatives from 32 ICUs answered the questionnaire. Nurses generally reported more negative feelings and more frequent regrets about providing NIV (median score, 3; interquartile range, [1 to 5] vs. 1 [1 to 5]; P < 0.0001) compared to ICU physicians. Sixty-four percent of ICU physicians and only 32% of nurses reported a high level of willingness to administer NIV, which was independently associated with NIV case-volume and workload. A high NIV session–related level of anxiety was observed in 37% of patients and 45% of relatives. “Dyspnea during NIV,” “long NIV session,” and “the need to have someone at the bedside” were identified as independent risk factors of high anxiety in patients. Conclusions Lack of willingness of caregivers to administer NIV and a high level of anxiety of patients and relatives in relation to NIV are frequent in the ICU. Most factors associated with low willingness to administer NIV by nurses or anxiety in patients and relatives may be amenable to change. Interventional studies are now warranted to evaluate how to reduce these risk factors and therefore contribute to better management of a potentially traumatic experience. (Anesthesiology 2016; 124:1347-59)

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3