Effect of Xenon Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane and Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery on Postoperative Cardiac Troponin Release

Author:

Hofland Jan1,Ouattara Alexandre2,Fellahi Jean-Luc3,Gruenewald Matthias4,Hazebroucq Jean5,Ecoffey Claude6,Joseph Pierre7,Heringlake Matthias8,Steib Annick9,Coburn Mark10,Amour Julien11,Rozec Bertrand12,Liefde Inge de1,Meybohm Patrick13,Preckel Benedikt14,Hanouz Jean-Luc15,Tritapepe Luigi16,Tonner Peter17,Benhaoua Hamina18,Roesner Jan Patrick19,Bein Berthold4,

Affiliation:

1. From the Sector Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Thorax Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2. Service d’Anesthésie-Réanimation II, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

3. Louis Pradel University Hospital, Lyon, France and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and Inserm U1060, Faculty of Medicine, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France

4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

5. Air Liquide Santé International, Paris-Saclay Research Center, Jouy-en-Josas, France

6. Department of Anesthesia, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France

7. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique Louis Pradel, Bron, France

8. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

9. Service d’Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

10. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

11. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Institut de Cardiologie - Chirurgie Cardiaque, Hôpital Pitié Salpetrière, Paris, France

12. Service d’Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital G&R Laënnec, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France

13. Clinic of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

14. Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

15. Service d’Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France

16. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico “Umberto I,” “La Sapienza,” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

17. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Links der Weser gGmbH, Bremen, Germany

18. Chirurgie Cardiovasculaire - Service de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Hospitalier de Rangueil, Toulouse, France

19. Clinic for Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Ischemic myocardial damage accompanying coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains a clinical challenge. We investigated whether xenon anesthesia could limit myocardial damage in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients, as has been reported for animal ischemia models. Methods In 17 university hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, and The Netherlands, low-risk elective, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients were randomized to receive xenon, sevoflurane, or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for anesthesia maintenance. The primary outcome was the cardiac troponin I concentration in the blood 24 h postsurgery. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in cardiac troponin I release between the xenon and sevoflurane groups was less than 0.15 ng/ml. Secondary outcomes were the safety and feasibility of xenon anesthesia. Results The first patient included at each center received xenon anesthesia for practical reasons. For all other patients, anesthesia maintenance was randomized (intention-to-treat: n = 492; per-protocol/without major protocol deviation: n = 446). Median 24-h postoperative cardiac troponin I concentrations (ng/ml [interquartile range]) were 1.14 [0.76 to 2.10] with xenon, 1.30 [0.78 to 2.67] with sevoflurane, and 1.48 [0.94 to 2.78] with total intravenous anesthesia [per-protocol]). The mean difference in cardiac troponin I release between xenon and sevoflurane was −0.09 ng/ml (95% CI, −0.30 to 0.11; per-protocol: P = 0.02). Postoperative cardiac troponin I release was significantly less with xenon than with total intravenous anesthesia (intention-to-treat: P = 0.05; per-protocol: P = 0.02). Perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes were comparable across all groups, with no safety concerns. Conclusions In postoperative cardiac troponin I release, xenon was noninferior to sevoflurane in low-risk, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Only with xenon was cardiac troponin I release less than with total intravenous anesthesia. Xenon anesthesia appeared safe and feasible.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3