Can Machine Learning Personalize Cardiovascular Therapy in Sepsis?

Author:

Catling Finneas J. R.12,Nagendran Myura23,Festor Paul34,Bien Zuzanna5,Harris Steve67,Faisal A. Aldo3489,Gordon Anthony C.2,Komorowski Matthieu2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

2. Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

3. UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

4. Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

5. School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, United Kingdom.

6. Department of Critical Care, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

7. Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

8. Institute of Artificial and Human Intelligence, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

9. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Large randomized trials in sepsis have generally failed to find effective novel treatments. This is increasingly attributed to patient heterogeneity, including heterogeneous cardiovascular changes in septic shock. We discuss the potential for machine learning systems to personalize cardiovascular resuscitation in sepsis. While the literature is replete with proofs of concept, the technological readiness of current systems is low, with a paucity of clinical trials and proven patient benefit. Systems may be vulnerable to confounding and poor generalization to new patient populations or contemporary patterns of care. Typical electronic health records do not capture rich enough data, at sufficient temporal resolution, to produce systems that make actionable treatment suggestions. To resolve these issues, we recommend a simultaneous focus on technical challenges and removing barriers to translation. This will involve improving data quality, adopting causally grounded models, prioritizing safety assessment and integration into healthcare workflows, conducting randomized clinical trials and aligning with regulatory requirements.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3