Author:
Beckie Theresa M.,Sengupta Avijit,Dey Arup Kanti,Dutta Kaushik,Ji Ming,Chellappan Sriram
Abstract
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention, HerBeat, compared with educational usual care (E-UC) for improving exercise capacity (EC) and other patient-reported outcomes at 3 mo among women with coronary heart disease.
Methods:
Women were randomized to the HerBeat group (n = 23), a behavior change mHealth intervention with a smartphone, smartwatch, and health coach or to the E-UC group (n = 24) who received a standardized cardiac rehabilitation workbook. The primary endpoint was EC measured with the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular disease risk factors and psychosocial well-being.
Results:
A total of 47 women (age 61.2 ± 9.1 yr) underwent randomization. The HerBeat group significantly improved on the 6MWT from baseline to 3 mo (P = .016, d = .558) while the E-UC group did not (P = .894, d =−0.030). The between-group difference of 38 m at 3 mo was not statistically significant. From baseline to 3 mo, the HerBeat group improved in anxiety (P = .021), eating habits confidence (P = .028), self-efficacy for managing chronic disease (P = .001), diastolic blood pressure (P = .03), general health perceptions (P = .047), perceived bodily pain (P = .02), and waist circumference (P = .008) while the E-UC group showed no improvement on any outcomes.
Conclusions:
The mHealth intervention led to improvements in EC and several secondary outcomes from baseline to 3 mo while the E-UC intervention did not. A larger study is required to detect small differences between groups. The implementation and outcomes evaluation of the HerBeat intervention was feasible and acceptable with minimal attrition.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Rehabilitation
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献