HISTOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF REPEATED MILD WEIGHT DROP AND LATERAL FLUID PERCUSSION INJURY MODELS OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN FEMALE AND MALE RATS

Author:

Vita Sydney M.,Cruise Shealan C.1,Gilpin Nicholas W.,Molina Patricia E.

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana

Abstract

ABSTRACT In preclinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) research, the animal model should be selected based on the research question and outcome measures of interest. Direct side-by-side comparisons of different injury models are essential for informing such decisions. Here, we used immunohistochemistry to compare the outcomes from two common models of TBI, lateral fluid percussion (LFP) and repeated mild weight drop (rmWD) in adult female and male Wistar rats. Specifically, we measured the effects of LFP and rmWD on markers of cerebrovascular and tight junction disruption, neuroinflammation, mature neurons, and perineuronal nets in the cortical site of injury, cortex adjacent to injury, dentate gyrus, and the CA 2/3 area of the hippocampus. Animals were randomized into the LFP or rmWD group. On day 1, the LFP group received a craniotomy, and on day 4, injury (or sham procedure; randomly assigned). The rmWD animals underwent either injury or isoflurane only (randomly assigned) on each of those 4 days. Seven days after injury, brains were harvested for analysis. Overall, our observations revealed that the most significant disruptions were evident in response to LFP, followed by craniotomy only, whereas rmWD animals showed the least residual changes compared with isoflurane-only controls, supporting consideration of rmWD as a mild injury. LFP led to longer-lasting disruptions, perhaps more representative of moderate TBI. We also report that craniotomy and LFP produced greater disruptions in females relative to males. These findings will assist the field in the selection of animal models based on target severity of postinjury outcomes and support the inclusion of both sexes and appropriate control groups.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3