Learning from patients: The impact of using patients’ narratives on patient experience scores

Author:

Nembhard Ingrid M.,Matta Sasmira,Shaller Dale,Lee Yuna S. H.,Grob Rachel,Schlesinger Mark

Abstract

Background Enthusiasm has grown about using patients’ narratives—stories about care experiences in patients’ own words—to advance organizations’ learning about the care that they deliver and how to improve it, but studies confirming association have not been published. Purpose We assessed whether primary care clinics that frequently share patients’ narratives with their staff have higher patient experience survey scores. Approach We conducted a 1-year study of 5,545 adult patients and 276 staff affiliated with nine clinics in one health system. We used multilevel models to analyze survey data from patients about their experiences and from staff about exposure to useful narratives. We examined staff confidence in own knowledge as a moderator because confidence can influence use of new information sources. Results Frequency of sharing useful narratives with staff was associated with patient experience scores for all measures, conditional on staff confidence in own knowledge (p < .01). For operational measures (e.g., care coordination), increased sharing correlated with subsequently higher performance for more confident staff and lower performance or no difference for less confident staff, depending on measure. For relational measures (e.g., patient–provider communication), increased sharing correlated with higher scores for less confident staff and lower scores for more confident staff. Conclusion Sharing narratives with staff frequently is associated with better patient experience survey scores, conditional on confidence in knowledge. Practice Implications Frequently sharing useful patient narratives should be encouraged as an organizational improvement strategy. However, organizations need to address how narrative feedback interacts with their staff’s confidence to realize higher experience scores across domains.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3