New insights about community benefit evaluation

Abstract

Background Nonprofit hospitals are required to conduct community health needs assessments (CHNA) every 3 years and develop corresponding implementation plans. Implemented strategies must address the identified community needs and be evaluated for impact. Purpose Using the Community Health Implementation Evaluation Framework (CHIEF), we assessed whether and how nonprofit hospitals are evaluating the impact of their CHNA-informed community benefit initiatives. Methodology We conducted a content analysis of 83 hospital CHNAs that reported evaluation outcomes drawn from a previously identified 20% random sample (n = 613) of nonprofit hospitals in the United States. Through qualitative review guided by the CHIEF, we identified and categorized the most common evaluation outcomes reported. Results A total of 485 strategies were identified from the 83 hospitals’ CHNAs. Evaluated strategies most frequently targeted behavioral health (n = 124, 26%), access (n = 83, 17%), and obesity/nutrition/inactivity (n = 68, 14%). The most common type of evaluation outcomes reported by CHIEF category included system utilization (n = 342, 71%), system implementation (n = 170, 35%), project management (n = 164, 34%), and social outcomes (n = 163, 34%). Practice Implications CHNA evaluation strategies focus on utilization (the number of individuals served), with few focusing on social or health outcomes. This represents a missed opportunity to (a) assess the social and health impacts across individual strategies and (b) provide insight that can be used to inform the allocation of limited resources to maximize the impact of community benefit strategies.