Antiemetic Administration and Its Association with Race: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

White Robert S.1ORCID,Andreae Michael H.2,Lui Briana3,Ma Xiaoyue4,Tangel Virginia E.5,Turnbull Zachary A.6,Jiang Silis Y.7,Nachamie Anna S.8,Pryor Kane O.9,Cuff Germaine,McCormick Patrick,Urman Richard D.,Pace Nathan L.,

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

2. 2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

3. 3Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

4. 4Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

5. 5Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

6. 6Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

7. 7Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

8. 8Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

9. 9Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Abstract

Background Anesthesiologists’ contribution to perioperative healthcare disparities remains unclear because patient and surgeon preferences can influence care choices. Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a patient- centered outcome measure and a main driver of unplanned admissions. Antiemetic administration is under the sole domain of anesthesiologists. In a U.S. sample, Medicaid insured versus commercially insured patients and those with lower versus higher median income had reduced antiemetic administration, but not all risk factors were controlled for. This study examined whether a patient’s race is associated with perioperative antiemetic administration and hypothesized that Black versus White race is associated with reduced receipt of antiemetics. Methods An analysis was performed of 2004 to 2018 Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group data. The primary outcome of interest was administration of either ondansetron or dexamethasone; secondary outcomes were administration of each drug individually or both drugs together. The confounder-adjusted analysis included relevant patient demographics (Apfel postoperative nausea and vomiting risk factors: sex, smoking history, postoperative nausea and vomiting or motion sickness history, and postoperative opioid use; as well as age) and included institutions as random effects. Results The Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group data contained 5.1 million anesthetic cases from 39 institutions located in the United States and The Netherlands. Multivariable regression demonstrates that Black patients were less likely to receive antiemetic administration with either ondansetron or dexamethasone than White patients (290,208 of 496,456 [58.5%] vs. 2.24 million of 3.49 million [64.1%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.82; P < 0.001). Black as compared to White patients were less likely to receive any dexamethasone (140,642 of 496,456 [28.3%] vs. 1.29 million of 3.49 million [37.0%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.78; P < 0.001), any ondansetron (262,086 of 496,456 [52.8%] vs. 1.96 million of 3.49 million [56.1%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.85; P < 0.001), and dexamethasone and ondansetron together (112,520 of 496,456 [22.7%] vs. 1.0 million of 3.49 million [28.9%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.79; P < 0.001). Conclusions In a perioperative registry data set, Black versus White patient race was associated with less antiemetic administration, after controlling for all accepted postoperative nausea and vomiting risk factors. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Healthy People 2030, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.

2. Geospatial analysis of patients’ social determinants of health for health systems science and disparity research.;Pearson;Int Anesthesiol Clin,2023

3. Antiemetic prophylaxis as a marker of health care disparities in the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry.;Andreae;Anesth Analg,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3