TREK-1 and TREK-2 Knockout Mice Are Not Resistant to Halothane or Isoflurane

Abstract

Background A variety of molecular targets for volatile anesthetics have been suggested, including the anesthetic-sensitive potassium leak channel, TREK-1. Knockout of TREK-1 is reported to render mice resistant to volatile anesthetics, making TREK-1 channels compelling targets for anesthetic action. Spinal cord slices from mice, either wild type or an anesthetic- hypersensitive mutant, Ndufs4, display an isoflurane-induced outward potassium leak that correlates with their minimum alveolar concentrations and is blocked by norfluoxetine. The hypothesis was that TREK-1 channels conveyed this current and contribute to the anesthetic hypersensitivity of Ndufs4. The results led to evaluation of a second TREK channel, TREK-2, in control of anesthetic sensitivity. Methods The anesthetic sensitivities of mice carrying knockout alleles of Trek-1 and Trek-2, the double knockout Trek-1;Trek-2, and Ndufs4;Trek-1 were measured. Neurons from spinal cord slices from each mutant were patch clamped to characterize isoflurane-sensitive currents. Norfluoxetine was used to identify TREK-dependent currents. Results The mean values for minimum alveolar concentrations (± SD) between wild type and two Trek-1 knockout alleles in mice (P values, Trek-1 compared to wild type) were compared. For wild type, minimum alveolar concentration of halothane was 1.30% (0.10), and minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane was 1.40% (0.11); for Trek-1tm1Lex, minimum alveolar concentration of halothane was 1.27% (0.11; P = 0.387), and minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane was 1.38% (0.09; P = 0.268); and for Trek-1tm1Lzd, minimum alveolar concentration of halothane was 1.27% (0.11; P = 0.482), and minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane was 1.41% (0.12; P = 0.188). Neither allele was resistant for loss of righting reflex. The EC50 values of Ndufs4;Trek-1tm1Lex did not differ from Ndufs4 (for Ndufs4, EC50 of halothane, 0.65% [0.05]; EC50 of isoflurane, 0.63% [0.05]; and for Ndufs4;Trek-1tm1Lex, EC50 of halothane, 0.58% [0.07; P = 0.004]; and EC50 of isoflurane, 0.61% [0.06; P = 0.442]). Loss of TREK-2 did not alter anesthetic sensitivity in a wild-type or Trek-1 genetic background. Loss of TREK-1, TREK-2, or both did not alter the isoflurane-induced currents in wild-type cells but did cause them to be norfluoxetine insensitive. Conclusions Loss of TREK channels did not alter anesthetic sensitivity in mice, nor did it eliminate isoflurane-induced transmembrane currents. However, the isoflurane-induced currents are norfluoxetine-resistant in Trek mutants, indicating that other channels may function in this role when TREK channels are deleted. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New