Feasibility of prone positioning for brain-injured patients with severe ARDS: A systematic review and pilot study (ProBrain)

Author:

Elmaleh Yoann12ORCID,Yavchitz Amélie3,Léguillier Teddy3,Squara Pierre-Alexandre3,Palpacuer Clément3,Grégoire Charles1

Affiliation:

1. aIntensive Care Unit, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.

2. bQuincy Anesthesiology, Hopital Privé Claude Galien, Boussy St Antoine, France.

3. cClinical Research Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.

Abstract

Background Prone position is a key component to treat hypoxemia in patients with severe Acute Respiratory Distress syndrom. However, most studies evaluating it exclude patients with brain-injuries without any medical evidence. Methods We planned: a systematic review to determine whether brain-injured patients were excluded in studies evaluating prone position on Acute Respiratory Distress syndrom; a prospective study including consecutive brain-injured patients needing prone position. Our primary endpoint was the evaluation of cerebral blood flow using transcranial Doppler after prone positioning. Secondary outcomes were intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and PtiO2. Results From 8183 citations retrieved, 120 studies were included in the systematic review. Among them, 90 studies excluded brain-injured patients (75%) without any justification, 16 included brain-injured patients (4 randomized, 7 non-randomized studies, 5 retrospective) and 14 did not retrieve brain-injured data. Eleven patients were included in our pilot study. No reduction of cerebral blood flow surrogates was observed during prone positioning: diastolic speed values (Mean±SD) ranging from 37.7±16.2 cm/s to 45.2 ±19.3 cm/s for the right side (p=0.897), 39.6 ±18.2 cm/s to 46.5±21.3 cm/s for the left side (p=0.569), and pulsatility index ranging from 1.14 ±0.31 to 1.0 ±0.32 for the right side (p=0.145) and 1.14 ±0.31 to 1.02 ±0.2 for the left side (p=0.564) before and during Prone Position. Conclusions Brain-injured patients are largely excluded from studies evaluating prone position in Acute Respiratory Distress syndrom. However, cerebral blood flow seems not to be altered considering increasing of MAP during session. Systematic exclusion of brain-injured patients appears to be unfounded and prone position, while at risk in brain-injured patients, should be evaluated on these patients to review recommendations, considering close monitoring of neurological and haemodynamic parameters.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pulmonary Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice: A Gene Set Enrichment Analysis;International Journal of Molecular Sciences;2024-03-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3