Evaluating postoperative outcome assessment tools in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: A comparative analysis of the comprehensive complication index and Clavien–Dindo classification in a cohort of 1240 patients at a tertiary care center

Author:

Limbu Yugal1,Acharya Bidur P.1,Mishra Aakash2,Regmee Sujan1,Ghimire Roshan1,Maharjan Dhiresh K.1,Shrestha Suman K.1,Thapa Prabin B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital

2. Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Abstract

Introduction: The comprehensive complication index (CCI) has emerged as a new tool for reporting postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of CCI and Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC) in measuring postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery. Materials and methods: In this single-centered, prospective, comparative study conducted between January 2022 and March 2023, 1240 patients underwent HPB surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomies and complex HPB surgery. Postoperative complications were evaluated utilizing the CCI and CDC indices, and their relationships with length of ICU stay, hospital stay, and return to activity were compared. Results: A total of 117 patients (9.44%) experienced complications of varying grades. There was a strong correlation between CCI and CDC (r=0.982, P <0.001). Both CCI and CDC demonstrated a strong correlation with the length of hospital stay, ICU stay, and return to normal activity. While CCI showed a better correlation with the length of hospital stay (r=0.706 vs. 0.695) and return to normal activity (r=0.620 vs. 0.611) than CDC, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CCI exhibited a stronger correlation with the length of stay and return to activity; however, no statistically significant advantage was observed over CDC.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3