Single breath count test and its applications in clinical practice: a systematic review

Abstract

Background: Single breath count test (SBCT) may be a reproducible, rapid, easy to perform and easy to interpret substitute to spirometry especially in low resource settings for certain conditions. Its interest has been rekindled with the recent COVID-19 pandemic and it can be done as a part of tele-medicine as well. Objectives: The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence of SBCT in clinical practice. Methods: The authors searched EMBASE, PubMed and Google Scholar for all the relevant articles as per exclusion and inclusion criteria. Two authors independently screened all the studies. Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. The systematic review was carried following the PRISMA guidelines. Results: After the rigorous process of screening, a total of 13 articles qualified for the systematic review. SBCT greater than 25 had sensitivity of greater than 80% in diagnosing myasthenia gravis exacerbation and SBCT less than or equal to 5 predicted the need for mechanical ventilation in Guillain–Barre syndrome (GBS) patients with 95.2% specificity. Also, Single breath count correlated significantly with forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in children with pulmonary pathology and in patients with COVID-19 it was used to rule out the need for noninvasive respiratory support. Conclusion: SBCT will undoubtedly be an asset in low resource settings and in tele-medicine to assess the prognosis and guide management of different respiratory and neuromuscular diseases.