Comparative Analysis of Taper Point and Reverse Cutting Needles on Skin Puncture Force

Author:

Maloney McKenzie E.1,Potter Christian T.23,Chun Benjamin D.24,Montilla Richard D.5,Schanbacher Carl F.26

Affiliation:

1. Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia;

2. Kuchnir Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Framingham, Massachusetts;

3. The University of Queensland Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana;

4. Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts;

5. Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts;

6. Department of Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Martha's Vineyard Hospital, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts

Abstract

BACKGROUND Reverse cutting needles are commonly used in cutaneous surgery due to their perceived ease of use. Despite this, there is limited research evaluating the force required to puncture skin using contemporary needles. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the puncture forces required for two different needle geometries across various gauge sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors assessed the force necessary to penetrate samples of human abdominal skin samples using taper needles of three different United States Pharmacopeia gauge sizes with their respective reverse cutting needle counterparts. Taper point needles tested were RB-1 (3-0), TF (4-0), and C-1 (5-0), while reverse cutting needles included PS-2 (3-0) and P-3 (4-0, 5-0). An electronic force meter was used to record the puncture force required by each needle type. RESULTS The mean puncture force in newtons (N) for taper point needles was 1.00, 0.74, and 0.48 for RB-1, TF, and C-1, respectively. The mean puncture force for reverse cutting needles was 0.95 N, 0.60 N, and 0.51 N for PS-2, P-3 (4-0), and P-3 (5-0), respectively. There was a direct relationship between needle body diameter and puncture force for both needle geometries. CONCLUSION There was no clinically significant difference in skin puncture force between needle geometries.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3